A.M. Solarino
Board of Director Effectiveness and Informal Institutions: A Meta-analysis
Solarino, A.M.; Boyd, B.K.
Authors
B.K. Boyd
Abstract
Research Summary: Board independence is central to corporate governance. Numerous theories espouse the value of the monitoring and advice provided by outside board members, and governance codes worldwide call for boards with more independent directors and for separating the roles of chief executive officer and chairman. However, neither original studies nor meta-analyses have found a substantial link between board independence and firm performance. We adopt an institutional logic perspective to argue that the relations between board independence and firm performance is moderated by the institutions of a country. Our analyses find that the strength of the informal institutions is a more important moderator than that of formal institutions. We employ country-level institutional moderators and apply meta-regression to a sample of 86 articles encompassing 40 nations. We offer suggestions for future governance research. Managerial Summary: Board independence is widely considered to be a hallmark of good governance. However, prior research has been unable to connect independence with a firm's financial performance. We provide practical advice by demonstrating how national institutions shape the consequences of an independent board. Using a multi-country sample, we show that the effectiveness of the corporate governance practices, such as board independence, depends on the strength of the local institutions and that the strength of the informal institutions is more important in explaining the effectiveness of the board than the strengths of the formal institutions. Stronger informal institutions strengthen the board independence- firm performance relationship. We discuss the implication of our findings.
Citation
Solarino, A., & Boyd, B. (2023). Board of Director Effectiveness and Informal Institutions: A Meta-analysis. Global Strategy Journal, 13(1), 58-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1468
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 14, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 1, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2023-02 |
Deposit Date | Oct 17, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 22, 2023 |
Journal | Global Strategy Journal |
Electronic ISSN | 2042-5805 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 58-89 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1468 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1188861 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(4.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Going complex or going easy? The impact of research questions on citations
(2023)
Journal Article
Family Agents
(2022)
Journal Article
Equivalence in International Business Research: A Three-step approach
(2022)
Journal Article
Are all forms of ownership prone to tunneling? A meta-analysis
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search