Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Two choices good, four choices better: For measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two

Vancleef, Kathleen; Read, Jenny C.A.; Herbert, William; Goodship, Nicola; Woodhouse, Maeve; Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio

Authors

Jenny C.A. Read

William Herbert

Nicola Goodship

Maeve Woodhouse

Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza



Citation

Vancleef, K., Read, J. C., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse, M., & Serrano-Pedraza, I. (2018). Two choices good, four choices better: For measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two. PLoS ONE, 13(7), Article e0201366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201366

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2018
Deposit Date Oct 31, 2022
Journal PLoS ONE
Publisher Public Library of Science
Volume 13
Issue 7
Article Number e0201366
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201366