When jokes aren’t funny: banter and abuse in the everyday work environments of professional football

Hickey, Colm; Roderick, Martin

Abstract

As with most professional institutions, English Premier League football clubs offer insightful, unique opportunities to more fully comprehend the cultural significance of banter and abuse within workplace environments. This article offers a new, critical perspective that provides a better understanding of the distinctive, intricate social discourses surrounding banter in the daily lives of professional footballers by answering the research question: What is the cultural significance of banter within the competitive work environments of English Premier League players? Research method Data were collected from 10 male participants (aged 18–30) by means of qualitative semi-structured vignette interviews. Each participant was interviewed on three separate occasions (30 interviews). Results and findings The data and subsequent analysis illustrate how banter is an accepted and legitimised discourse within professional football, but promotes considerable anxiety, stress and unhappiness in work environments. Implication This study provides an original insight into the attitudes professional football players hold towards banter. Contributing to the existing research that has examined forms of abuse within sport, this article aims to better inform the management and development of athlete well-being and player care.

Citation

Hickey, C., & Roderick, M. (2024). When jokes aren’t funny: banter and abuse in the everyday work environments of professional football. European Sport Management Quarterly, 24(2), 383-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2124299

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 7, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Sep 20, 2022
• Publication Date: 2024
• Deposit Date: Nov 14, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Nov 14, 2022
• Journal: European Sport Management Quarterly
• Print ISSN: 1618-4742
• Electronic ISSN: 1746-031X
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 383-403
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2124299
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1185685