Low volumes of quartz cement in deeply buried Fulmar Formation sandstones explained by a low effective stress burial history

Oye, Olakunle J.; Aplin, Andrew C.; Orland, Ian J.; Valley, John W.

Abstract

Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation sandstones from the Fulmar Field in the Central North Sea are buried to 3.2 km and 128 °C but contain only 3.7 ± 1.7% (1σ) quartz cement, substantially less than volumes predicted by models based on temperature-related quartz precipitation kinetics. Oxygen isotope microanalysis of quartz overgrowths suggests that only limited cementation occurred at temperatures above 110 °C. We suggest that the anomalously low volumes of quartz cement are most readily explained by the effective stress history of the Fulmar Formation. Regional pore pressure analysis strongly suggests that pore fluid pressures in the Fulmar Formation decreased substantially in the last <0.5 Ma as a result of lateral seal failure, increasing effective stress from ca. 10 MPa to the current 31 MPa. A recent increase in effective stress is supported by the common occurrence of grains that are both fractured and unhealed by quartz cement. Intergranular pressure dissolution can account for around one third of the observed quartz cement, with the remainder from deep burial feldspar dissolution. We argue that the continuous history of low effective stress, until the very recent geological past, limited the rate of silica supply by intergranular pressure dissolution, and thus the rate of quartz cementation. Effective stress histories should be incorporated into predictive models of quartz cementation of sandstones.

Citation

Oye, O. J., Aplin, A. C., Orland, I. J., & Valley, J. W. (2023). Low volumes of quartz cement in deeply buried Fulmar Formation sandstones explained by a low effective stress burial history. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 221, Article 211383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211383

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Dec 19, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Dec 29, 2022
• Publication Date: 2023-02
• Deposit Date: Jan 3, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Jan 3, 2023
• Journal: Geoenergy Science and Engineering
• Print ISSN: 2949-8910
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 221
• Article Number: 211383
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211383
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1184578