Andrew M. Ireson
A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
Ireson, Andrew M.; Spiteri, Raymond J.; Clark, Martyn P.; Mathias, Simon A.
Authors
Abstract
A simple numerical solution procedure – namely the method of lines combined with an off-the-shelf ordinary differential equation (ODE) solver – was shown in previous work to provide efficient, mass-conservative solutions to the pressure-head form of Richards' equation. We implement such a solution in our model openRE. We developed a novel method to quantify the boundary fluxes that reduce water balance errors without negative impacts on model runtimes – the solver flux output method (SFOM). We compare this solution with alternatives, including the classic modified Picard iteration method and the Hydrus 1D model. We reproduce a set of benchmark solutions with all models. We find that Celia's solution has the best water balance, but it can incur significant truncation errors in the simulated boundary fluxes, depending on the time steps used. Our solution has comparable runtimes to Hydrus and better water balance performance (though both models have excellent water balance closure for all the problems we considered). Our solution can be implemented in an interpreted language, such as MATLAB or Python, making use of off-the-shelf ODE solvers. We evaluated alternative SciPy ODE solvers that are available in Python and make practical recommendations about the best way to implement them for Richards' equation. There are two advantages of our approach: (i) the code is concise, making it ideal for teaching purposes; and (ii) the method can be easily extended to represent alternative properties (e.g., novel ways to parameterize the K(ψ) relationship) and processes (e.g., it is straightforward to couple heat or solute transport), making it ideal for testing alternative hypotheses.
Citation
Ireson, A. M., Spiteri, R. J., Clark, M. P., & Mathias, S. A. (2023). A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0). Geoscientific Model Development, 16(2), 659-677. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 4, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 27, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023 |
Deposit Date | Jan 31, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 31, 2023 |
Journal | Geoscientific Model Development |
Print ISSN | 1991-959X |
Electronic ISSN | 1991-9603 |
Publisher | European Geosciences Union |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 16 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 659-677 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1183903 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(2.5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
You might also like
Banding in the Margins of Basaltic Dykes Indicates Pulsatory Propagation During Emplacement
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search