Mr James Nightingale james.w.nightingale@durham.ac.uk
Research Associate
Abell 1201: detection of an ultramassive black hole in a strong gravitational lens
Nightingale, JW; Smith, Russell J; He, Qiuhan; O’Riordan, Conor M; Kegerreis, Jacob A; Amvrosiadis, Aristeidis; Edge, Alastair C; Etherington, Amy; Hayes, Richard G; Kelly, Ash; Lucey, John R; Massey, Richard J
Authors
Dr Russell Smith russell.smith@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Dr Qiuhan He qiuhan.he@durham.ac.uk
Post Doctoral Research Associate
Conor M O’Riordan
Jacob A Kegerreis
Mr Aristeidis Amvrosiadis aristeidis.amvrosiadis@durham.ac.uk
Post Doctoral Research Associate
Professor Alastair Edge alastair.edge@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Miss Amy Etherington amy.etherington@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy
Richard G Hayes
Mr Ashley James Kelly a.j.kelly@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy
Dr John Lucey john.lucey@durham.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
Professor Richard Massey r.j.massey@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are a key catalyst of galaxy formation and evolution, leading to an observed correlation between SMBH mass MBH and host galaxy velocity dispersion σe. Outside the local Universe, measurements of MBH are usually only possible for SMBHs in an active state: limiting sample size and introducing selection biases. Gravitational lensing makes it possible to measure the mass of non-active SMBHs. We present models of the z = 0.169 galaxy-scale strong lens Abell 1201. A cD galaxy in a galaxy cluster, it has sufficient ‘external shear’ that a magnified image of a z = 0.451 background galaxy is projected just ∼1 kpc from the galaxy centre. Using multiband Hubble Space Telescope imaging and the lens modelling software PYAUTOLENS, we reconstruct the distribution of mass along this line of sight. Bayesian model comparison favours a point mass with MBH = 3.27 ± 2.12 × 1010 M⊙ (3σ confidence limit); an ultramassive black hole. One model gives a comparable Bayesian evidence without an SMBH; however, we argue this model is nonphysical given its base assumptions. This model still provides an upper limit of MBH ≤ 5.3 × 1010 M⊙, because an SMBH above this mass deforms the lensed image ∼1 kpc from Abell 1201’s centre. This builds on previous work using central images to place upper limits on MBH, but is the first to also place a lower limit and without a central image being observed. The success of this method suggests that surveys during the next decade could measure thousands more SMBH masses, and any redshift evolution of the MBH−σe relation. Results are available at https://github.com/Jammy2211/autolens_abell_1201.
Citation
Nightingale, J., Smith, R. J., He, Q., O’Riordan, C. M., Kegerreis, J. A., Amvrosiadis, A., …Massey, R. J. (2023). Abell 1201: detection of an ultramassive black hole in a strong gravitational lens. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 521(3), 3298-3322. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad587
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 19, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 29, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023-05 |
Deposit Date | Mar 29, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 29, 2023 |
Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Print ISSN | 0035-8711 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2966 |
Publisher | Royal Astronomical Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 521 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 3298-3322 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad587 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(6.7 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2023, The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
You might also like
PyAutoGalaxy: Open-Source Multiwavelength Galaxy Structure & Morphology
(2023)
Journal Article
Testing strong lensing subhalo detection with a cosmological simulation
(2022)
Journal Article
Automated galaxy-galaxy strong lens modelling: No lens left behind
(2022)
Journal Article
Galaxy–galaxy strong lens perturbations: line-of-sight haloes versus lens subhaloes
(2022)
Journal Article