Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Questionable Metascience Practices

Rubin, Mark

Questionable Metascience Practices Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Metascientists have studied questionable research practices in science. The present article considers the parallel concept of questionable metascience practices (QMPs). A QMP is a research practice, assumption, or perspective that has been questioned by several commentators as being potentially problematic for metascience and/or the science reform movement. The present article reviews ten QMPs that relate to criticism, replication, bias, generalization, and the characterization of science. Specifically, the following QMPs are considered: (1) rejecting or ignoring self-criticism; (2) a fast ‘n’ bropen scientific criticism style; (3) overplaying the role of replication in science; (4) assuming a replication rate is “too low” without specifying an “acceptable” rate; (5) an unacknowledged metabias towards explaining the replication crisis in terms of researcher bias; (6) assuming that researcher bias can be reduced; (7) devaluing exploratory results as being more “tentative” than confirmatory results; (8) presuming that questionable research practices are problematic research practices; (9) focusing on knowledge accumulation; and (10) focusing on specific scientific methods. It is stressed that only some metascientists engage in some QMPs some of the time, and that these QMPs may not always be problematic. Research is required to estimate the prevalence and impact of QMPs. In the meantime, QMPs should be viewed as invitations to ask questions about how we go about doing better metascience.

Citation

Rubin, M. (online). Questionable Metascience Practices. Journal of trial and error, https://doi.org/10.36850/mr4

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 23, 2023
Online Publication Date Apr 24, 2023
Deposit Date Apr 26, 2023
Publicly Available Date Apr 26, 2023
Journal Journal of Trial and Error
Electronic ISSN 2667-1204
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.36850/mr4
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1175195

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations