Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

“No fences make bad neighbors” but markets make better ones: cap-and-trade reduces cross-border SO2 in a natural experiment

Leppert, Daniel

“No fences make bad neighbors” but markets make better ones: cap-and-trade reduces cross-border SO2 in a natural experiment Thumbnail


Authors

Profile image of Daniel Leppert

Daniel Leppert daniel.j.leppert@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy



Abstract

The clean air interstate rule (CAIR) was a regional cap-and-trade program announced in 2005 which covered 27 eastern US states and sought to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. The rule was later vacated after a court found that the non-targeted design of the program did not comply with the Clean Air Act provision to regulate interstate air pollution. Using a custom air pollution dispersion model, I calculate the interstate SO2 pollution from 493 coal-fired power plants across the United States between 1997 and 2020. In a difference-in-differences setup with plants not covered by CAIR in the control group, I estimate the treatment effect of the program on overall- and cross-border SO2 emissions and find a 24% reduction in overall emissions and reduces the risk that a plant violates air quality standards across state borders by 2–4%. I report evidence of heterogeneous treatment effects where the reduction in overall emissions attributed to CAIR is lower among plants transporting SO2 in excess of 1% of the National Air Quality Standards to another state.

Citation

Leppert, D. (2023). “No fences make bad neighbors” but markets make better ones: cap-and-trade reduces cross-border SO2 in a natural experiment. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 25, 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00367-z

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 13, 2023
Online Publication Date Apr 29, 2023
Publication Date 2023-07
Deposit Date May 16, 2023
Publicly Available Date May 16, 2023
Journal Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Print ISSN 1432-847X
Electronic ISSN 1867-383X
Publisher Springer
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 25
Pages 407–433
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00367-z
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1172761

Files

Published Journal Article (4 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as
you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article
are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is
not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission
directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licen
ses/by/4.0/.






Downloadable Citations