Federalisation versus Centralisation: tensions in fundamental rights discourse in the EU
(2009)
Book Chapter
Spaventa, E. (2009). Federalisation versus Centralisation: tensions in fundamental rights discourse in the EU. In M. Dougan, & S. Currie (Eds.), 50 Years of the European treaties : looking back and thinking forward (343-364). Hart Publishing
Outputs (4)
Case T-256/07, Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. Council, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 October 2008, Case T-284/08, Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. Council, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 December 2008 (2009)
Journal Article
Spaventa, E. (2009). Case T-256/07, Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. Council, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 October 2008, Case T-284/08, Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. Council, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 December 2008. Common Market Law Review, 46(4), 1239-1263The rulings in the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) cases annotated here are part of lengthy litigation brought by the PMOI before national and European courts in order to challenge national and European authorities’ decisions to includ... Read More about Case T-256/07, Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. Council, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 October 2008, Case T-284/08, Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. Council, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 December 2008.
The Rule of which Law? The use of legal language in the rhetoric of the anni di piombo (2009)
Book Chapter
Spaventa, E. (2009). The Rule of which Law? The use of legal language in the rhetoric of the anni di piombo. In P. Antonello, & A. O'Leary (Eds.), Imagining terrorism : the rhetoric and representation of political violence in Italy 1969-2009 (116-127). Legenda
Leaving Keck behind? The free movement of goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos (2009)
Journal Article
Spaventa, E. (2009). Leaving Keck behind? The free movement of goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos. European law review, 35(6), 914-932Contrasts the approach taken by the Advocates General and the European Court of Justice in Commission of the European Communities v Italy (C-110/05) and Aklagaren v Mickelsson (C-142/05) regarding the extent to which national rules restricting the us... Read More about Leaving Keck behind? The free movement of goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos.