Leaving Keck behind? The free movement of goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos

Spaventa, E

Abstract

Contrasts the approach taken by the Advocates General and the European Court of Justice in Commission of the European Communities v Italy (C-110/05) and Aklagaren v Mickelsson (C-142/05) regarding the extent to which national rules restricting the use of goods were measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports. Considers whether the "certain selling arrangements" criterion laid down by the European Court of Justice in Criminal Proceedings against Keck (C-267/91) has been replaced by a market access test.

Citation

Spaventa, E. (2009). Leaving Keck behind? The free movement of goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos. European law review, 35(6), 914-932

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2009
• Deposit Date: Mar 8, 2012
• Journal: European Law Review
• Print ISSN: 0307-5400
• Electronic ISSN: 2754-1800
• Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 35
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 914-932
• Keywords: EC law, Free movement of goods, Italy, Justification, Measures having equivalent effect, National legislation, Proportionality, Sweden.
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1502881
• Publisher URL: http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=6968&recordid=427