Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Outputs (12)

The Human Rights Act in a Culture of Control (2017)
Book Chapter
Greene, A. (2017). The Human Rights Act in a Culture of Control. In C. Smyth, & R. Lang (Eds.), The future of human rights in the UK (4-26). Cambridge Scholars Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901018

The UK is currently in the midst of a robust backlash against human rights. The election of a Conservative majority to Government in the 2015 general election with the express pledge of repealing the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) in its manifesto has p... Read More about The Human Rights Act in a Culture of Control.

Defining Terrorism: One Size Fits All? (2017)
Journal Article
Greene, A. (2017). Defining Terrorism: One Size Fits All?. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 411-440. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589317000070

This article challenges the idea, both in domestic and international law, of defining terrorism. Using section 1 of the UK's Terrorism Act 2000 as an illustrative example, this article argues that a single definition of terrorism is invariably broad... Read More about Defining Terrorism: One Size Fits All?.

Pouvoirs Anti-Terroristes Permanents Au Royaume-Uni: Quelles Leçons Pour La France? (2016)
Journal Article
Greene, A. (2016). Pouvoirs Anti-Terroristes Permanents Au Royaume-Uni: Quelles Leçons Pour La France?. Archives de politique criminelle (En ligne), 38(1), 169-187

Le Royaume-Uni dispose d’une longue expérience du terrorisme, à l’intérieur comme à l’extérieur de ses frontières. Les différentes mesures prises pour combattre les menaces induites tant par le conflit en Irlande du Nord que par l’extrémisme islamist... Read More about Pouvoirs Anti-Terroristes Permanents Au Royaume-Uni: Quelles Leçons Pour La France?.

Questioning Executive Supremacy in an Economic State of Emergency (2015)
Journal Article
Greene, A. (2015). Questioning Executive Supremacy in an Economic State of Emergency. Legal Studies, 35(4), 594-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12082

This paper compares and contrasts state emergency responses to national security crises with responses deployed in a period of economic crisis. Specifically, this paper challenges the appropriateness and legitimacy of the standard emergency response... Read More about Questioning Executive Supremacy in an Economic State of Emergency.

The Quest for a Satisfactory Definition of Terrorism: R v Gul (2014)
Journal Article
Greene, A. (2014). The Quest for a Satisfactory Definition of Terrorism: R v Gul. Modern Law Review, 77(5), 780-793. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12090

The UK Supreme Court judgment in R v Gul presented a unique opportunity for a judicial appraisal of the definition of terrorism contained in section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000. While the applicant was ultimately unsuccessful in his challenge, the Su... Read More about The Quest for a Satisfactory Definition of Terrorism: R v Gul.

Restructuring the European Court of Human Rights: Preserving the Right of Individual Petition and Promoting Constitutionalism (2013)
Journal Article
Dzehtsiarou, K., & Greene, A. (2013). Restructuring the European Court of Human Rights: Preserving the Right of Individual Petition and Promoting Constitutionalism. Public Law, 2013, 710-719

Argues that the large caseload of the European Court of Human Rights can be addressed without losing the individual complaints procedure by the Chambers focusing solely on adjudicatory cases and the Grand Chamber on constitutional issues. Evaluates t... Read More about Restructuring the European Court of Human Rights: Preserving the Right of Individual Petition and Promoting Constitutionalism.

Separating Normalcy from Emergency: The Jurisprudence of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights (2011)
Journal Article
Greene, A. (2011). Separating Normalcy from Emergency: The Jurisprudence of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights. German law journal, 12(10), 1764-1785

This article argues that the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) approach to the interpretation of Article 15 ignores the concept of. By principally analyzing Lawless v. Ireland and A v. the United Kingdom, this article discerns that the ECtHR fo... Read More about Separating Normalcy from Emergency: The Jurisprudence of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights.