Why Any Legal Positivist Idea of Legal Obligation Is Untenable: A Kantian-Gewirthian Synthesis
(2024)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2024). Why Any Legal Positivist Idea of Legal Obligation Is Untenable: A Kantian-Gewirthian Synthesis. In D. Beyleveld, & S. Bertea (Eds.), Theories of Legal Obligation (61-97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54067-7_4
Professor Deryck Beyleveld's Outputs (61)
The Concept of Human Rights in the UDHR and the Rule of Law for the World Today (2023)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Pattinson, S. D. (2023). The Concept of Human Rights in the UDHR and the Rule of Law for the World Today. In M. Dahlin, J. Garland, A. Lind, A. Singer, & S. Slokenberga (Eds.), Festskrift till Elisabeth Rynning: Integritet och rättssäkerhet inom och bortom den medicinska rätten. iUstus
Moral Interests, Privacy, and Medical Research (2023)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Pattinson, S. D. (2023). Moral Interests, Privacy, and Medical Research. In M. Boylan (Ed.), International Public Health Policy and Ethics (61-73). (2nd). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39973-2_5This chapter examines the relationship between the values of research and privacy in the context of medical research on patient data. An analytical framework is developed by interpreting the conception of privacy advanced in the jurisprudence of the... Read More about Moral Interests, Privacy, and Medical Research.
The Concept of Human Rights in the UDHR and the Rule of Law for the World Today (2023)
Book Chapter
Pattinson, S., & Beyleveld, D. (2023). The Concept of Human Rights in the UDHR and the Rule of Law for the World Today. In M. Dahlin, J. Garland, A. Lind, A. Singer, & S. Slokenberga (Eds.), Festskrift till Elisabeth Rynning: Integritet och rättssäkerhet inom och bortom den medicinska rätten (41–55). Uppsala, Sweden: Iustus
Morality and Intellectual Property Law Through the Lens of Human Rights (2022)
Book Chapter
Adcock, M., & Beyleveld, D. (2022). Morality and Intellectual Property Law Through the Lens of Human Rights. In C. Godt, G. Van Overwalle, L. Guibault, & D. Beyleveld (Eds.), Boundaries of Information Property (121-147). Intersentia
Is There Really Anything Wrong With an Absolute Principle? (2020)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2020). Is There Really Anything Wrong With an Absolute Principle?. In M. Borowski (Ed.), Modern German Non-Positivism – From Radbruch to Alexy (279-292). Mohr Siebeck
EU, Norway and NAS Law Report Framework. (2018)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Townend, D. (in press). EU, Norway and NAS Law Report Framework. In D. Beyleveld, D. Townend, S. Rouille-Mirza, & J. Wright (Eds.), The Data Protection Directive and Medical Research Across Europe (115-123). Ashgate Publishing
Legal Issues Concerning Regulation of Chimeras and Hybrids (2018)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (in press). Legal Issues Concerning Regulation of Chimeras and Hybrids. In J. Taupitz, & M. Weschka (Eds.), CHIMBRIDS - Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research: Scientific, Ethical, Philosophical and Legal Aspects (645-666). Springer Verlag
Final statement on the concerted action “Basic Principles of Bioethics And Biolaw” (2018)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (in press). Final statement on the concerted action “Basic Principles of Bioethics And Biolaw”. In J. Rendtorff, & P. Kemp (Eds.), Centre for Ethics and Law and Barcelona: Institute Borja de Bioètica (45-55)
Making sense of human dignity (2018)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (in press). Making sense of human dignity. In J. Coggon, S. Chan, S. Holm, & T. Kushner (Eds.), From reason to practice in bioethics: An anthology dedicated to the works of John Harris. Manchester University Press
Privacy, Confidentiality and Data Protection (2018)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (in press). Privacy, Confidentiality and Data Protection. In R. Chadwick, H. T. Have, & E. M. Meslin (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Health Care Ethics: Core and Emerging Issues. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200971.n10
UK: Case 1-10 according to UK law (2018)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (in press). UK: Case 1-10 according to UK law. In J. Taupitz, & M. Weschka (Eds.), CHIMBRIDS - Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research: Scientific, Ethical, Philosophical and Legal Aspects (847-853). Springer Verlag
Sheffield Natural Law School (2017)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2017). Sheffield Natural Law School. In M. Sellers, & P. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy (1-18). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_58-1“The Sheffield Natural Law School” (SNLS) designates the work of a group of scholars influenced by Beyleveld and Brownsword (1986), who use the moral theory of Gewirth (1978), according to which the Principle of Generic Consistency (PGC) (see below)... Read More about Sheffield Natural Law School.
What Is Gewirth and What IS Beyleveld? A Retrospect with Comments on the Contributions (2017)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2017). What Is Gewirth and What IS Beyleveld? A Retrospect with Comments on the Contributions. In P. Capps, & S. D. Pattinson (Eds.), Ethical rationalism and the law (233-255). Hart Publishing
Transcendental Arguments for a Categorical Imperative as Arguments from Agential Self-Understanding (2017)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2017). Transcendental Arguments for a Categorical Imperative as Arguments from Agential Self-Understanding. In J. P. Brune, R. Stern, & M. H. Werner (Eds.), Transcendental arguments in moral theory (141-159). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110470215-008This chapter construes Kant’s contention that a categorical imperative is a synthetic a priori principle as equivalent to Gewirth’s claim that such an imperative is a dialectically necessary principle (a strict requirement of agential self-understand... Read More about Transcendental Arguments for a Categorical Imperative as Arguments from Agential Self-Understanding.
Gewirth versus Kant on Kant’s Maxim of Reason: Towards a Gewirthian Philosophical Anthropology (2016)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2016). Gewirth versus Kant on Kant’s Maxim of Reason: Towards a Gewirthian Philosophical Anthropology. In P. Bauhn (Ed.), Gewirthian perspectives on human rights (13-29). Routledge
The duties we have to future generations: a Gewirthian approach (2016)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2016). The duties we have to future generations: a Gewirthian approach. In G. Bos, & M. Düwell (Eds.), Human rights and sustainability : moral responsibilities for the future (137-150). Routledge
Research Participants and the Right to be Informed (2015)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2015). Research Participants and the Right to be Informed. In P. R. Ferguson, & G. T. Laurie (Eds.), Inspiring a medico-legal revolution : essays in honour of Sheila McLean (173-188). RoutledgeIntroducing Autonomy, Consent and the Law,1 Sheila McLean remarks that if the law is ‘to facilitate or protect the capacity of an autonomous person to make an autonomous choice – one that reflects his or her own values – it is necessary to develop st... Read More about Research Participants and the Right to be Informed.
Hope and Belief (2012)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D. (2012). Hope and Belief. In R. Jenkins, & E. Sullivan (Eds.), Philosophy of Mind (1-36). Nova Science Publishers
Confidentiality and Data Protection (2010)
Book Chapter
Pattinson, S. D., & Beyleveld, D. (2010). Confidentiality and Data Protection. In A. Grubb, J. Laing, & J. McHale (Eds.), Principles of medical law (651-723). (3rd). Oxford University Press