Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A qualitative study of contemporary secure mental health services: women service users’ views in England

Walker, Tammi; Shaw, Jenny; Edge, Dawn; Senior, Jane; Sutton, Matthew; Meacock, Rachel; Wilson, Hannah; McNair, Louisa; Mitchell, Heather; Gutridge, Kerry; Abel, Kathryn M.

Authors

Jenny Shaw

Dawn Edge

Jane Senior

Matthew Sutton

Rachel Meacock

Hannah Wilson

Louisa McNair

Heather Mitchell

Kerry Gutridge

Kathryn M. Abel



Abstract

Women’s Enhanced Medium Secure Services (WEMSS) was a concept borne out of findings that an inappropriate number of women were being held in high secure services, despite not fulfilling high secure criterion. A qualitative study of women service users’ views of living in WEMSS and comparator medium secure services (MSS) in the UK is presented. Sixteen service users participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis identified four main themes: experiences of current placement versus previous placements, relationships with staff, challenges of living with other women and having a voice–being involved in care and treatment. The accounts reported suggest that women in WEMSS and standard MSS have very similar experiences of their service, relationships with staff, living with other women and involvement in care. This qualitative study suggests that women in WEMSS and comparable women in MSS have very similar perspectives on what works well in their current services and what is important to them. The main differences between WEMSS and MSS women’s accounts were in relation to the amount of pre-transfer information they received and levels of staff support. Implications for practice are discussed, including service-user empowerment addressing barriers to relational security.

Citation

Walker, T., Shaw, J., Edge, D., Senior, J., Sutton, M., Meacock, R., Wilson, H., McNair, L., Mitchell, H., Gutridge, K., & Abel, K. M. (2019). A qualitative study of contemporary secure mental health services: women service users’ views in England. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(5), 836-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2019.1646305

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Jul 29, 2019
Publication Date Sep 3, 2019
Deposit Date Feb 22, 2025
Journal Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Print ISSN 1478-9949
Electronic ISSN 1478-9957
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 30
Issue 5
Pages 836-853
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2019.1646305
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3534747