Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Investigating the Efficacy of the Web-Based Common Elements Toolbox (COMET) Single-Session Interventions in Improving UK University Student Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lambert, Jeffrey; Loades, Maria; Marshall, Noah; Higson-Sweeney, Nina; Chan, Stella; Mahmud, Arif; Pile, Victoria; Maity, Ananya; Adam, Helena; Sung, Beatrice; Luximon, Melanie; MacLennan, Keren; Berry, Clio; Chadwick, Paul

Investigating the Efficacy of the Web-Based Common Elements Toolbox (COMET) Single-Session Interventions in Improving UK University Student Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial. Thumbnail


Authors

Jeffrey Lambert

Maria Loades

Noah Marshall

Nina Higson-Sweeney

Stella Chan

Arif Mahmud

Victoria Pile

Ananya Maity

Helena Adam

Beatrice Sung

Melanie Luximon

Clio Berry

Paul Chadwick



Abstract

Background:
Mental health problems in university students are associated with many negative outcomes, yet there is a gap between need and timely access to help. Single-session interventions (SSIs) are designed to be scalable and accessible, delivering core evidence-based intervention components within a one-off encounter.

Objective:
COMET (Common Elements Toolbox) is an online self-help SSI that includes behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, gratitude, and self-compassion. COMET has previously been evaluated in India, Kenya, and the United States with promising results. This study tests the acceptability, appropriateness, perceived utility, and efficacy of COMET among UK university students during the peripandemic period.

Methods:
We conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of COMET compared with a control group, with 2- and 4-week follow-ups. Outcome variables were subjective well-being, depression severity, anxiety severity, positive affect, negative affect, and perceived stress. We also measured intervention satisfaction immediately after completion of COMET. All UK university students with access to the internet were eligible to participate and were informed of the study online. The data were analyzed using linear mixed models and reported in accordance with the CONSORT-EHEALTH (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile Health Applications and Online Telehealth) checklist.

Results:
Of the 831 people screened, 468 participants were randomized to a condition, 407 completed the postintervention survey, 147 returned the 2-week follow-up survey, 118 returned the 4-week follow-up survey, and 89 returned both. Of the 239 randomized, 212 completed COMET. Significant between-group differences in favor of the COMET intervention were observed at 2-week follow-ups for subjective well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale; mean difference [MD] 1.39, 95% CI 0.19-2.61; P=.03), depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; MD –1.31, 95% CI –2.51 to –0.12; P=.03), and perceived stress (4-item Perceived Stress Scale; MD –1.33, 95% CI –2.10 to –0.57; P<.001). Overall, participants were satisfied with COMET, with the majority endorsing the intervention and its modules as acceptable, appropriate, and exhibiting high utility. The self-compassion module was most often reported as the participants’ favorite module and the behavioral activation module was their least favorite. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants found COMET generally accessible, but too long, and experienced immediate and long-term beneficial effects.

Conclusions:
This study demonstrated high engagement with the COMET intervention, along with preliminary short-term efficacy. Almost all participants completed the intervention, but study attrition was high. Participant feedback indicated a high level of overall satisfaction with the intervention, with perceived accessibility, immediate benefits, and potential long-term impact being notable findings. These findings support the potential value of COMET as a mental health intervention and highlight important areas for further improvement.

Citation

Lambert, J., Loades, M., Marshall, N., Higson-Sweeney, N., Chan, S., Mahmud, A., Pile, V., Maity, A., Adam, H., Sung, B., Luximon, M., MacLennan, K., Berry, C., & Chadwick, P. (2025). Investigating the Efficacy of the Web-Based Common Elements Toolbox (COMET) Single-Session Interventions in Improving UK University Student Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article e58164. https://doi.org/10.2196/58164

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 19, 2024
Online Publication Date Jan 31, 2025
Publication Date 2025
Deposit Date Mar 10, 2025
Publicly Available Date Mar 10, 2025
Journal Journal of Medical Internet Research
Electronic ISSN 1438-8871
Publisher JMIR Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Article Number e58164
DOI https://doi.org/10.2196/58164
Keywords Internet-Based Intervention, Universities, Mental Health, Common Elements Toolbox, university students, Students - psychology - statistics & numerical data, Young Adult, online interventions, Humans, Male, Female, mental well-being, United Kingdom, Internet, Adult, single-session interventions
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3487698

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations