Professor Birgit Schyns birgit.schyns@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Romance of leadership (ROL) theory describes over-attributions of responsibility for organizational outcomes to leaders. The theory posits that ROL should be stronger during crisis, for unexpected performance, and in scapegoating failure. We replicate Meindl et al. (1985, study 6) to test those original tenets with greater power and a more generalizable sample. Study 1 does not replicate the 1985 study, and our results suggest crisis does not affect ROL, meaning that leaders are not held more responsible under crisis conditions versus non-crisis conditions. In Study 2, participants attributed significantly more responsibility to leaders for non-crisis than crisis conditions. Contrary to our expectations, we found that leaders were held more responsible for success than for failure, suggesting that heroic leadership generated more ROL than scapegoating. Also, in Study 2, participants attributed more responsibility to leaders for unexpected versus expected outcomes. Adding the nature of crisis (product failure versus product harm crises) in Study 2 did not lead to any expected differences. Our results from the exploration of untested theory in these two studies reject early tenets of ROL as being greater in times of crisis or for blame. We discuss implications for the ROL theory and broader leadership research.
Schyns, B., Vogelgesang Lester, G., & Hammond, M. (online). An Exploration of Romance of Leadership in Times of Crisis: Replication and Extension of Theory. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311251314406
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 5, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 4, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Jan 7, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 21, 2025 |
Journal | Journal of Management Scientific Reports |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311251314406 |
Keywords | Romance of Leadership; Attribution; Crisis; Leadership; Scapegoating |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3326179 |
Accepted Journal Article
(721 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This accepted manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Me, me, me - narcissism and motivation to lead
(2022)
Journal Article
Trapped at Work: The Barriers Model of Abusive Supervision
(2021)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search