Max Wilkinson
The plausibility of claimed induced seismicity
Wilkinson, Max; Mhana, Najwa; Wilson, Miles P.; Foulger, Gillian R.; Tezel, Timur; Gluyas, Jon G.
Authors
Najwa Mhana
Miles Wilson miles.wilson@durham.ac.uk
Academic Visitor
Gillian Foulger g.r.foulger@durham.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
Dr Timur Tezel timur.tezel@durham.ac.uk
Sponsored Researcher Post
Jon G. Gluyas
Abstract
Claims of industrially induced seismicity vary from indisputable to unpersuasive and yet the veracity of industrial induction is vital for regulatory and operational practice. Assessment schemes have been developed in response to this need. We report here an initial assessment of the reliability of all globally known cases of proposed human-induced earthquakes and invite specialists on particular cases to refine these results. 1235 cases were assessed, requiring over 1000 h of work. From the 881 cases for which scorable evidence is available, we class 87% as ‘Confidently Induced’, 10% as ‘Probably Induced’, 2% as ‘Equivocal’ and < 1% as ‘Confidently Natural’. The most seismogenic activities are fracking, research, geothermal, water reservoir impoundment, conventional oil and gas. Least seismogenic activities are construction, deep penetrating bombs, coal bed methane. 354 cases (29%) lack enough information to be assessable. Future work could include applying data mining techniques including natural language processing and AI to uncover new evidence. Future best practice for rapid assessment of cases would ideally involve an independent panel of scientists who rapidly apply a questionnaire scheme, reach consensus, and inform a response.
Citation
Wilkinson, M., Mhana, N., Wilson, M. P., Foulger, G. R., Tezel, T., & Gluyas, J. G. (2024). The plausibility of claimed induced seismicity. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 30846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81632-3
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 27, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 28, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024 |
Deposit Date | Jan 14, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 14, 2025 |
Journal | Scientific Reports |
Electronic ISSN | 2045-2322 |
Publisher | Nature Research |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 30846 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81632-3 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3324374 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(2.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Surface ruptures following the 30 October 2016 Mw 6.5 Norcia earthquake, central Italy
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search