Tom E. Hardwicke
Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022
Hardwicke, Tom E.; Thibault, Robert T.; Clarke, Beth; Moodie, Nicholas; Crüwell, Sophia; Schiavone, Sarah R.; Handcock, Sarah A.; Nghiem, Khanh An; Mody, Fallon; Eerola, Tuomas; Vazire, Simine
Authors
Robert T. Thibault
Beth Clarke
Nicholas Moodie
Sophia Crüwell
Sarah R. Schiavone
Sarah A. Handcock
Khanh An Nghiem
Fallon Mody
Professor Tuomas Eerola tuomas.eerola@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Simine Vazire
Abstract
More than a decade of advocacy and policy reforms have attempted to increase the uptake of transparent research practices in the field of psychology; however, their collective impact is unclear. We estimated the prevalence of transparent research practices in (a) all psychology journals (i.e., field-wide), and (b) prominent psychology journals, by manually examining two random samples of 200 empirical articles (N = 400) published in 2022. Most articles had an open-access version (field-wide: 74%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [67%, 79%]; prominent: 71% [64%, 77%]) and included a funding statement (field-wide: 76% [70%, 82%]; prominent: 76% [70%, 82%]) or conflict-of-interest statement (field-wide: 76% [70%, 82%]; prominent: 73% [67%, 79%]). Relatively few articles had a preregistration (field-wide: 7% [2.5%, 12%]; prominent: 14% [8.5%, 19%]), materials (field-wide: 16% [9%, 24%]; prominent: 19% [12%, 27%]), raw/primary data (field-wide: 14% [7%, 21%]; prominent: 16% [9.5%, 24%]), or analysis scripts (field-wide: 8.5% [4.5%, 13%]; prominent: 14% [9.5%, 19%]) that were immediately accessible without contacting authors or third parties. In conjunction with prior research, our results suggest transparency increased moderately from 2017 to 2022. Overall, despite considerable infrastructure improvements, bottom-up advocacy, and top-down policy initiatives, research transparency continues to be widely neglected in psychology.
Citation
Hardwicke, T. E., Thibault, R. T., Clarke, B., Moodie, N., Crüwell, S., Schiavone, S. R., Handcock, S. A., Nghiem, K. A., Mody, F., Eerola, T., & Vazire, S. (2024). Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241283477
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 26, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 24, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024-12 |
Deposit Date | Jan 17, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 17, 2025 |
Journal | Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science |
Electronic ISSN | 2515-2459 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 4 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241283477 |
Keywords | |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3230018 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(448 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
onsetsync: An R Package for Onset SynchronyAnalysis
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search