Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022

Hardwicke, Tom E.; Thibault, Robert T.; Clarke, Beth; Moodie, Nicholas; Crüwell, Sophia; Schiavone, Sarah R.; Handcock, Sarah A.; Nghiem, Khanh An; Mody, Fallon; Eerola, Tuomas; Vazire, Simine

Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022 Thumbnail


Authors

Tom E. Hardwicke

Robert T. Thibault

Beth Clarke

Nicholas Moodie

Sophia Crüwell

Sarah R. Schiavone

Sarah A. Handcock

Khanh An Nghiem

Fallon Mody

Simine Vazire



Abstract

More than a decade of advocacy and policy reforms have attempted to increase the uptake of transparent research practices in the field of psychology; however, their collective impact is unclear. We estimated the prevalence of transparent research practices in (a) all psychology journals (i.e., field-wide), and (b) prominent psychology journals, by manually examining two random samples of 200 empirical articles (N = 400) published in 2022. Most articles had an open-access version (field-wide: 74%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [67%, 79%]; prominent: 71% [64%, 77%]) and included a funding statement (field-wide: 76% [70%, 82%]; prominent: 76% [70%, 82%]) or conflict-of-interest statement (field-wide: 76% [70%, 82%]; prominent: 73% [67%, 79%]). Relatively few articles had a preregistration (field-wide: 7% [2.5%, 12%]; prominent: 14% [8.5%, 19%]), materials (field-wide: 16% [9%, 24%]; prominent: 19% [12%, 27%]), raw/primary data (field-wide: 14% [7%, 21%]; prominent: 16% [9.5%, 24%]), or analysis scripts (field-wide: 8.5% [4.5%, 13%]; prominent: 14% [9.5%, 19%]) that were immediately accessible without contacting authors or third parties. In conjunction with prior research, our results suggest transparency increased moderately from 2017 to 2022. Overall, despite considerable infrastructure improvements, bottom-up advocacy, and top-down policy initiatives, research transparency continues to be widely neglected in psychology.

Citation

Hardwicke, T. E., Thibault, R. T., Clarke, B., Moodie, N., Crüwell, S., Schiavone, S. R., Handcock, S. A., Nghiem, K. A., Mody, F., Eerola, T., & Vazire, S. (2024). Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241283477

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 26, 2024
Online Publication Date Dec 24, 2024
Publication Date 2024-12
Deposit Date Jan 17, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jan 17, 2025
Journal Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Electronic ISSN 2515-2459
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241283477
Keywords
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3230018

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations