Global-scale evaluation of precipitation datasets for hydrological modelling

Gebrechorkos, Solomon H.; Leyland, Julian; Dadson, Simon J.; Cohen, Sagy; Slater, Louise; Wortmann, Michel; Ashworth, Philip J.; Bennett, Georgina L.; Boothroyd, Richard; Cloke, Hannah; Delorme, Pauline; Griffith, Helen; Hardy, Richard; Hawker, Laurence; McLelland, Stuart; Neal, Jeffrey; Nicholas, Andrew; Tatem, Andrew J.; Vahidi, Ellie; Liu, Yinxue; Sheffield, Justin; Parsons, Daniel R.; Darby, Stephen E.

Abstract

Precipitation is the most important driver of the hydrological cycle, but it is challenging to estimate it over large scales from satellites and models. Here, we assessed the performance of six global and quasi-global high-resolution precipitation datasets (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5), Climate Hazards group Infrared Precipitation with Stations version 2.0 (CHIRPS), Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation version 2.80 (MSWEP), TerraClimate (TERRA), Climate Prediction Centre Unified version 1.0 (CPCU), and Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Cloud Classification System-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CCS-CDR, hereafter PERCCDR) for hydrological modelling globally and quasi-globally. We forced the WBMsed global hydrological model with the precipitation datasets to simulate river discharge from 1983 to 2019 and evaluated the predicted discharge against 1825 hydrological stations worldwide, using a range of statistical methods. The results show large differences in the accuracy of discharge predictions when using different precipitation input datasets. Based on evaluation at annual, monthly, and daily timescales, MSWEP followed by ERA5 demonstrated a higher correlation (CC) and Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) than other datasets for more than 50 % of the stations, whilst ERA5 was the second-highest-performing dataset, and it showed the highest error and bias for about 20 % of the stations. PERCCDR is the least-well-performing dataset, with a bias of up to 99 % and a normalised root mean square error of up to 247 %. PERCCDR only show a higher KGE and CC than the other products for less than 10 % of the stations. Even though MSWEP provided the highest performance overall, our analysis reveals high spatial variability, meaning that it is important to consider other datasets in areas where MSWEP showed a lower performance. The results of this study provide guidance on the selection of precipitation datasets for modelling river discharge for a basin, region, or climatic zone as there is no single best precipitation dataset globally. Finally, the large discrepancy in the performance of the datasets in different parts of the world highlights the need to improve global precipitation data products.

Citation

Gebrechorkos, S. H., Leyland, J., Dadson, S. J., Cohen, S., Slater, L., Wortmann, M., Ashworth, P. J., Bennett, G. L., Boothroyd, R., Cloke, H., Delorme, P., Griffith, H., Hardy, R., Hawker, L., McLelland, S., Neal, J., Nicholas, A., Tatem, A. J., Vahidi, E., Liu, Y., …Darby, S. E. (2024). Global-scale evaluation of precipitation datasets for hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(14), 3099-3118. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3099-2024

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 29, 2024
• Online Publication Date: Jul 17, 2024
• Publication Date: Jul 17, 2024
• Deposit Date: Sep 23, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 23, 2024
• Journal: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
• Print ISSN: 1027-5606
• Electronic ISSN: 1607-7938
• Publisher: Copernicus Publications
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 28
• Issue: 14
• Pages: 3099-3118
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3099-2024
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2874783