Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions

Tranter, Samuel

Abstract

The connection between ecological responsibility and differing conceptions of Christian eschatology is widely observed. It is often assumed that the necessary response to Christian environmental inaction is affirmation of a strongly this-worldly vision of new creation (so, influentially, N. T. Wright). However, recent systematic theology has seen retrieval of elements of eschatology that foreground discontinuity and transcendence (e.g. Hans Boersma). Moreover, there are exegetical challenges to continuationist claims (e.g. Markus Bockmuehl and Edward Adams) and doctrinal reactions to ‘eschatological naturalism’ (Katherine Sonderegger and Michael Allen). Where does this leave the connection between ecological witness and the content of Christian hope? Doubtless, continuationist accounts have some salutary emphases, but on exegetical, doctrinal and moral grounds I seek to disentangle the assumed compact of particular construals of this-worldly continuity and ethical commitment. Finally, drawing on James Cone's meditations upon black spiritual traditions, I explore how discontinuous interpretations of the life to come themselves need not undermine responsible action.

Citation

Tranter, S. (online). Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions. Scottish Journal of Theology, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0036930624000310

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Apr 10, 2024
• Online Publication Date: Jun 5, 2024
• Deposit Date: Jul 16, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 17, 2024
• Journal: Scottish Journal of Theology
• Print ISSN: 0036-9306
• Electronic ISSN: 1475-3065
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0036930624000310
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2600137