Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Social moderation and calibration versus codification: a way forward for academic standards in higher education?

O’Donovan, Berry; Sadler, Ian; Reimann, Nicola

Social moderation and calibration versus codification: a way forward for academic standards in higher education? Thumbnail


Authors

Berry O’Donovan

Ian Sadler

Nicola Reimann



Abstract

A key responsibility of higher education providers is the accurate certification of the knowledge and skills attained by their students. However, despite an intense focus on developing relevant quality assurance regulations, academic standards in higher education have remained resistant to explication and consistent application. In this paper, we initially deconstruct and evaluate academic standards and dominant practitioner perspectives on their nature and use, including techno-rational, sociocultural and sociomaterial approaches. The limited prior research on the effectiveness of calibration and social moderation processes is reviewed, highlighting the significant challenges in sharing tacitly held understandings of assessment criteria (attributes of quality) and standards (levels of achievement). Further complications are considered that arise from the varying expertise and power relationships of assessors and the complexities inherent in the development and use of codified artefacts for capturing and sharing standards. We opine that because of the difficulties in clearly representing and agreeing standards, it is unsurprising that there is little evidence of marking consistency to be found in the literature even in contexts where carefully crafted artefacts, such as rubrics, are in use. We conclude that effectiveness would be enhanced through sharing understandings more widely and refocusing the use of assessment codifications towards how they may catalyse effective social moderation and calibration dialogues. Dialogues that foreground individuals’ positions of consensus and dissensus at significant points of interpretation in the assessment process are identified within the paper.

Citation

O’Donovan, B., Sadler, I., & Reimann, N. (2024). Social moderation and calibration versus codification: a way forward for academic standards in higher education?. Studies in Higher Education, 49(12), 2693-2706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2321504

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 16, 2024
Online Publication Date Feb 26, 2024
Publication Date 2024
Deposit Date Feb 28, 2024
Publicly Available Date Feb 28, 2024
Journal Studies in Higher Education
Print ISSN 0307-5079
Electronic ISSN 1470-174X
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 49
Issue 12
Pages 2693-2706
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2321504
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2288855

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations