Berry O’Donovan
Social moderation and calibration versus codification: a way forward for academic standards in higher education?
O’Donovan, Berry; Sadler, Ian; Reimann, Nicola
Authors
Ian Sadler
Nicola Reimann
Abstract
A key responsibility of higher education providers is the accurate certification of the knowledge and skills attained by their students. However, despite an intense focus on developing relevant quality assurance regulations, academic standards in higher education have remained resistant to explication and consistent application. In this paper, we initially deconstruct and evaluate academic standards and dominant practitioner perspectives on their nature and use, including techno-rational, sociocultural and sociomaterial approaches. The limited prior research on the effectiveness of calibration and social moderation processes is reviewed, highlighting the significant challenges in sharing tacitly held understandings of assessment criteria (attributes of quality) and standards (levels of achievement). Further complications are considered that arise from the varying expertise and power relationships of assessors and the complexities inherent in the development and use of codified artefacts for capturing and sharing standards. We opine that because of the difficulties in clearly representing and agreeing standards, it is unsurprising that there is little evidence of marking consistency to be found in the literature even in contexts where carefully crafted artefacts, such as rubrics, are in use. We conclude that effectiveness would be enhanced through sharing understandings more widely and refocusing the use of assessment codifications towards how they may catalyse effective social moderation and calibration dialogues. Dialogues that foreground individuals’ positions of consensus and dissensus at significant points of interpretation in the assessment process are identified within the paper.
Citation
O’Donovan, B., Sadler, I., & Reimann, N. (2024). Social moderation and calibration versus codification: a way forward for academic standards in higher education?. Studies in Higher Education, 49(12), 2693-2706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2321504
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 16, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 26, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024 |
Deposit Date | Feb 28, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 28, 2024 |
Journal | Studies in Higher Education |
Print ISSN | 0307-5079 |
Electronic ISSN | 1470-174X |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 49 |
Issue | 12 |
Pages | 2693-2706 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2321504 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2288855 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version)
(1.7 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Published Journal Article
(1.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature
(2022)
Journal Article
Student mental health nurses’ understanding of recovery: a phenomenographic study
(2021)
Journal Article
Enhancing Teaching through Intercultural Reflection on Teaching: the IntRef Project
(2019)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search