Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Vaccine politics: Law and inequality in the pandemic response to COVID‐19

Kavanagh, Matthew M.; Singh, Renu

Authors

Matthew M. Kavanagh



Abstract

International mechanisms failed to achieve equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines—prolonging and deepening the pandemic. To understand why, we conduct process tracing of the first year of international policymaking on vaccine equity. We find that, in the absence of a single venue for global negotiation, two competing law and policy paradigms emerged. One focused on demand and voluntary action by states and firms, while the alternative focused on opening knowledge and expanding production through national and international law. While these could have been complementary, power inequalities between key actors kept the second paradigm from gaining traction on the global agenda. The failure of the prevailing policy paradigm to secure equity is explained, not by unforeseen technical and financing challenges as some suggest, but by a fundamental misalignment with the political environment. While norm entrepreneurs encouraged sharing, political incentives pushed governments towards securing and hoarding doses. Firms responded to the latter. Mechanisms like COVAX proved incapable of countering these predictable international and domestic political forces. Earlier funding would not likely have changed the behaviour of states or firms in the absence of legal commitment. Barring significant geopolitical changes, a shift to include open/supply-focused policies will be necessary to achieve equity in future pandemics.

Citation

Kavanagh, M. M., & Singh, R. (2023). Vaccine politics: Law and inequality in the pandemic response to COVID‐19. Global Policy, 14(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13203

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 3, 2023
Online Publication Date Mar 29, 2023
Publication Date 2023-05
Deposit Date Feb 23, 2024
Journal Global Policy
Print ISSN 1758-5880
Electronic ISSN 1758-5899
Publisher Durham University
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Issue 2
Pages 229-246
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13203
Keywords Law; Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; Political Science and International Relations; Economics and Econometrics; Global and Planetary Change
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2273483