Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Effects of type of emission and masking sound, and their spatial correspondence, on blind and sighted people’s ability to echolocate

Thaler, L.; Castillo-Serrano, J. G.; Kish, D.; Norman, L.

Effects of type of emission and masking sound, and their spatial correspondence, on blind and sighted people’s ability to echolocate Thumbnail


Authors

J. G. Castillo-Serrano

D. Kish



Abstract

Ambient sound can mask acoustic signals. The current study addressed how echolocation in people is affected by masking sound, and the role played by type of sound and spatial (i.e. binaural) similarity. We also investigated the role played by blindness and long-term experience with echolocation, by testing echolocation experts, as well as blind and sighted people new to echolocation. Results were obtained in two echolocation tasks where participants listened to binaural recordings of echolocation and masking sounds, and either localized echoes in azimuth or discriminated echo audibility. Echolocation and masking sounds could be either clicks or broad band noise. An adaptive staircase method was used to adjust signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) based on participants’ responses. When target and masker had the same binaural cues (i.e. both were monoaural sounds), people performed better (i.e. had lower SNRs) when target and masker used different types of sound (e.g. clicks in noise-masker or noise in clicks-masker), as compared to when target and masker used the same type of sound (e.g. clicks in click-, or noise in noise-masker). A very different pattern of results was observed when masker and target differed in their binaural cues, in which case people always performed better when clicks were the masker, regardless of type of emission used. Further, direct comparison between conditions with and without binaural difference revealed binaural release from masking only when clicks were used as emissions and masker, but not otherwise (i.e. when noise was used as masker or emission). This suggests that echolocation with clicks or noise may differ in their sensitivity to binaural cues. We observed the same pattern of results for echolocation experts, and blind and sighted people new to echolocation, suggesting a limited role played by long-term experience or blindness. In addition to generating novel predictions for future work, the findings also inform instruction in echolocation for people who are blind or sighted.

Citation

Thaler, L., Castillo-Serrano, J. G., Kish, D., & Norman, L. (2024). Effects of type of emission and masking sound, and their spatial correspondence, on blind and sighted people’s ability to echolocate. Neuropsychologia, 196, Article 108822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108822

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 8, 2024
Online Publication Date Feb 9, 2024
Publication Date Apr 15, 2024
Deposit Date Feb 8, 2024
Publicly Available Date Feb 13, 2024
Journal Neuropsychologia
Print ISSN 0028-3932
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 196
Article Number 108822
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108822
Keywords Masking, Audition, SNR, Release from masking, Blindness
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2230353

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations