David Archard
How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement.
Archard, David; Cave, Emma; Brierley, Joe
Abstract
Where parents seek treatment for their young child that healthcare professionals cannot agree to, the High Court can determine what is in the child's best interests. Some activists and academics seek change to impose threshold criteria that would bolster the decision-making rights of parents and reduce deference to clinicians and the courts. We defend the best interests standard against arguments that a higher threshold of 'significant harm' should apply. We do so from ethical, legal, and clinical perspectives. The matter is of significant moral and practical importance, especially in light of the divergence of academic opinion, the burgeoning number of cases coming before the courts and recent case law and statutory attempts to effect change. We begin by disputing ethical claims that a significant harm threshold is preferable to the best interests standard, and then we set out jurisprudential and practical arguments that demonstrate the imprudence of a significant harm threshold and defend the established yardstick of best interests..]
Citation
Archard, D., Cave, E., & Brierley, J. (2024). How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement. Medical Law Review, 32(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad040
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 16, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 5, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2024-03 |
Deposit Date | Nov 17, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 12, 2023 |
Journal | Medical Law Review |
Print ISSN | 0967-0742 |
Electronic ISSN | 1464-3790 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 32 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 158–177 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad040 |
Keywords | Best interests, Treatment, Children’s rights, Parental rights, Child, Harm |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1931511 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version)
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
The infected blood scandal: lessons for clinical research.
(2024)
Journal Article
Liability For Rugby Related Neuro-Degenerative Disease: A Question of Tort
(2024)
Journal Article
Infected blood scandal – what you need to know
(2024)
Newspaper / Magazine
A Future Orientated View of Autonomy
(2023)
Book Chapter
The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (1984)
(2023)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search