Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A laboratory experiment on the heuristic switching model

Anufriev, Mikhail; Chernulich, Aleksei; Tuinstra, Jan

Authors

Mikhail Anufriev

Jan Tuinstra



Abstract

We present results from the first laboratory experiment on the seminal heuristic switching model introduced by Brock and Hommes (1997, 1998). Subjects choose between two alternatives, a sophisticated and stabilizing, but costly, heuristic, and a destabilizing, but cheap, heuristic, and are paid according to the performance of the chosen heuristic. Aggregate choices determine the evolution of a state variable and, consequently, the performance of both heuristics. Theoretically, an increase in the costs for the stabilizing heuristic generates instability and leads to endogenous fluctuations in both the state variable and the fraction of agents using that heuristic.

We vary the costs of the stabilizing heuristic in the experiment and find that the predictions of the heuristic switching model are partially confirmed. For low costs the dynamics are stable. For high costs, the dynamics initially are unstable and exhibit the type of bubbles and crashes emblematic for the heuristic switching model. However, over time the pattern of bubbles and crashes disappears and the dynamics become more stable. We estimate a standard discrete choice model on aggregate choice data and observe that subjects have a tendency to become less sensitive to payoff differences when the environment is less stable, which has important implications for the application of heuristic switching models.

Citation

Anufriev, M., Chernulich, A., & Tuinstra, J. (2018). A laboratory experiment on the heuristic switching model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 91, 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.04.004

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 4, 2018
Online Publication Date Apr 18, 2018
Publication Date 2018-06
Deposit Date Nov 7, 2023
Journal Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Print ISSN 0165-1889
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 91
Pages 21-42
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.04.004
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1899513