Professor Catherine Donovan catherine.donovan@durham.ac.uk
Professor
‘I wasn’t aware at the time, I could actually say “no”’: Intimacy, Expectations, and Consent in Queer Relationships
Donovan, Catherine; Butterby, Kate; Barnes, Rebecca
Authors
Dr Kate Butterby kate.butterby@durham.ac.uk
Post Doctoral Research Associate
Rebecca Barnes
Contributors
Sophie Franklin
Editor
Hannah Piercy
Editor
Arya Thampuran
Editor
Rebecca White
Editor
Abstract
Drawing on interview data collected in three projects exploring domestic abuse in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships, this chapter examines sexual consent in LGB and/or T+ people’s abusive relationships through a queer lens. Three themes are considered. First, Catherine Donovan and Marianne Hester’s two ‘relationship rules’ underpinning abusive relationships are applied. These determine that the relationship is for the abusive partner and on their terms; and that the victim/survivor is responsible for everything, including their partner’s abusive behaviour. Participants’ accounts show how these relationship rules can delegitimate victim/survivors’ attempts to exercise consent and conversely legitimate non-consensual sex. Second, Carole Pateman’s ‘sexual contract’ is drawn upon to demonstrate how abusive partners mandate sex whenever and however they wish, while victimised partners feel duty-bound to acquiesce. This, it is argued, reproduces cis-heteronormative sexual scripts based on public stories about love and intimacy and conventionally gendered binaries such as initiator/follower. Third, accounts demonstrating how more experienced LGB and/or T+ partners can exercise experiential power to instil norms about sex and intimacy are analysed. It is concluded that these abusive practices frame the context in which sexual victimisation occurs in LGB and/or T+ people’s intimate relationships and inhibit victims/survivors from recognising and naming sexual violence.
Citation
Donovan, C., Butterby, K., & Barnes, R. (2023). ‘I wasn’t aware at the time, I could actually say “no”’: Intimacy, Expectations, and Consent in Queer Relationships. In S. Franklin, H. Piercy, A. Thampuran, & R. White (Eds.), Consent: Legacies, Representations, and Frameworks for the Future (154-169). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003365082-14
Online Publication Date | Nov 10, 2023 |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2023 |
Deposit Date | Oct 4, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 8, 2024 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 154-169 |
Book Title | Consent: Legacies, Representations, and Frameworks for the Future |
Chapter Number | 11 |
ISBN | 9781032429625 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003365082-14 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1756833 |
Contract Date | Jun 1, 2023 |
Files
Published Book Chapter
(220 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Sexual violence as a sexual script in mainstream online pornography
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search