Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Can a code-based approach to marking and feedback reduce teachers’ workload? An evaluation of the FLASH marking intervention

Morris, R.; Gorard, S.; See, B.H.; Siddiqui, N.

Can a code-based approach to marking and feedback reduce teachers’ workload? An evaluation of the FLASH marking intervention Thumbnail


Authors

R. Morris



Abstract

Heavy teacher workload is of considerable policy concern in many education systems in the world. It is considered one of the main contributory factors in teacher attrition. One aspect of workload that could be addressed is reducing the amount of marking and feedback required for students. This paper reports on the results of a randomised control trial and in-depth investigation of Flash Marking, an intervention aimed at reducing teachers’ marking workload. Flash Marking is a code-based feedback approach involving peer and self-assessment, reducing the need to use alphanumeric grading while embedding metacognition. The study involved Year 10 pupils (aged 14 to 15) and their English language teachers in 103 secondary schools in England. It ran for two years (2018-2020). The impact of the intervention was estimated as the difference in before and after measures of teacher workload, comparing teachers in 52 schools randomised to the intervention, and 51 teachers in business-as-usual schools. The results show that the intervention had the effect of reducing teacher’s workload by reducing their working hours (effect size 0.16), including hours spent on marking and feedback (0.17). The training was well received by teachers, although some teachers were apprehensive about whether the intervention was appropriate for those with lower prior attainment. The intervention was largely implemented as designed.

Citation

Morris, R., Gorard, S., See, B., & Siddiqui, N. (2023). Can a code-based approach to marking and feedback reduce teachers’ workload? An evaluation of the FLASH marking intervention. Oxford Review of Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2023.2258779

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 8, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 10, 2023
Publication Date 2023
Deposit Date Aug 10, 2023
Publicly Available Date Oct 26, 2023
Journal Oxford Review of Education
Print ISSN 0305-4985
Electronic ISSN 1465-3915
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2023.2258779
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1714798

Files

Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version) (1.1 Mb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations