Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Measuring perceived empathy in dialogue systems

Concannon, Shauna; Tomalin, Marcus

Measuring perceived empathy in dialogue systems Thumbnail


Authors

Marcus Tomalin



Abstract

Dialogue systems, from Virtual Personal Assistants such as Siri, Cortana, and Alexa to state-of-the-art systems such as BlenderBot3 and ChatGPT, are already widely available, used in a variety of applications, and are increasingly part of many people’s lives. However, the task of enabling them to use empathetic language more convincingly is still an emerging research topic. Such systems generally make use of complex neural networks to learn the patterns of typical human language use, and the interactions in which the systems participate are usually mediated either via interactive text-based or speech-based interfaces. In human–human interaction, empathy has been shown to promote prosocial behaviour and improve interaction. In the context of dialogue systems, to advance the understanding of how perceptions of empathy affect interactions, it is necessary to bring greater clarity to how empathy is measured and assessed. Assessing the way dialogue systems create perceptions of empathy brings together a range of technological, psychological, and ethical considerations that merit greater scrutiny than they have received so far. However, there is currently no widely accepted evaluation method for determining the degree of empathy that any given system possesses (or, at least, appears to possess). Currently, different research teams use a variety of automated metrics, alongside different forms of subjective human assessment such as questionnaires, self-assessment measures and narrative engagement scales. This diversity of evaluation practice means that, given two DSs, it is usually impossible to determine which of them conveys the greater degree of empathy in its dialogic exchanges with human users. Acknowledging this problem, the present article provides an overview of how empathy is measured in human–human interactions and considers some of the ways it is currently measured in human–DS interactions. Finally, it introduces a novel third-person analytical framework, called the Empathy Scale for Human–Computer Communication (ESHCC), to support greater uniformity in how perceived empathy is measured during interactions with state-of-the-art DSs.

Citation

Concannon, S., & Tomalin, M. (2023). Measuring perceived empathy in dialogue systems. AI and Society, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01715-z

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 21, 2023
Online Publication Date Jul 23, 2023
Publication Date 2023
Deposit Date Aug 8, 2023
Publicly Available Date Aug 8, 2023
Journal AI & SOCIETY
Print ISSN 0951-5666
Electronic ISSN 1435-5655
Publisher Springer
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01715-z
Keywords Artificial Intelligence; Human-Computer Interaction; Philosophy
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1713205

Files

Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version) (860 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations