Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Extended modal realism — a new solution to the problem of intentional inexistence

Thomas, Andrew D.

Extended modal realism — a new solution to the problem of intentional inexistence Thumbnail


Authors

Andrew Thomas andrew.thomas@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy



Abstract

Kriegel described the problem of intentional inexistence as one of the ‘perennial problems of philosophy’ (Kriegel Philosophical Perspectives 21(1), 307–340, 2007: 307). In the same paper, Kriegel alluded to a modal realist solution to the problem of intentional inexistence. However, Kriegel does not state by name who defends the kind of modal realist solution he has in mind. Kriegel also points out that even what he believes to be the strongest version of modal realism does not pass the ‘principle of representation’ and thus modal realism is not an adequate solution to the problem of intentional inexistence. In this paper, I respond to Kriegel by defending a modal realist solution that he did not consider in 2007, called ‘extended modal realism’ (EMR). EMR is a version of modal realism where possible worlds are not completely isolated as they are under the Lewisian model. Rather, under EMR worlds are, in a way, spatiotemporally related. The fact EMR worlds are related allows EMR to sufficiently pass the principle of representation and thus can be deemed a legitimate solution to the problem of intentional inexistence. I conclude that either EMR can pass the principle of representation in some cases or, and I think the more sensible option, we give up on the principle of representation altogether.

Citation

Thomas, A. D. (2020). Extended modal realism — a new solution to the problem of intentional inexistence. Philosophia, 48(3), 1197-1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00126-z

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 3, 2019
Online Publication Date Nov 8, 2019
Publication Date 2020-07
Deposit Date Nov 15, 2019
Publicly Available Date Nov 15, 2019
Journal Philosophia
Print ISSN 0048-3893
Electronic ISSN 1574-9274
Publisher Springer
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 48
Issue 3
Pages 1197-1208
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00126-z
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1699937

Files


Published Journal Article (Advance online version) (280 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Advance online version This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.





Downloadable Citations