Professor Mandy Green mandy.green@durham.ac.uk
Professor
‘Two Great Sexes Animate the World’: Looking Past ‘Milton’s Bogey’ in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’
Green, Mandy
Authors
Contributors
Professor Mandy Green mandy.green@durham.ac.uk
Editor
Sharihan Al-Akhras
Editor
Abstract
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is generally acknowledged to be one of the most remarkable readings of Paradise Lost to issue from the Romantic period, and Shelley openly signals the epic’s importance as an interpretative key to her work. It is frequently noted that, while Frankenstein and his Creature identify themselves openly with both Adam and Satan, there is, surprisingly, no mention of Milton’s Eve. Feminist readings of the novel in the seventies and eighties, especially the brilliant, provocative essay by Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, found it difficult to look past ‘Milton’s Bogey’, and from that partial perspective Frankenstein becomes a ‘despairingly acquiescent’ retelling of the misogynistic story at the core of the epic in which ‘femaleness and fallenness’ are ‘essentially synonymous’ (TS : Please link all unlinked citations to the respective references in the book-end bibliography.2020: 189; 234). The foregrounding of conversation, together with the establishment of the domestic sphere as the vital stage of human activity in Milton’s epic, allows for a more richly complex insight into its place at the heart of Frankenstein and a more nuanced understanding of the absent presence of Eve in the novel. Shelley emerges as a more critically responsive reader of Paradise Lost than had been previously recognised: by evoking repressed alternatives through a controlled use of Miltonic allusion, Shelley, like Milton, offers the reader insights into how things could and should have been.
Citation
Green, M. (2021). ‘Two Great Sexes Animate the World’: Looking Past ‘Milton’s Bogey’ in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’. In M. Green, & S. Al-Akhras (Eds.), Women (Re)Writing Milton (49-70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367760205
Online Publication Date | May 5, 2021 |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2021 |
Deposit Date | Nov 18, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 18, 2020 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 49-70 |
Series Title | Routledge studies in Renaissance literature and culture |
Edition | 1st ed. |
Book Title | Women (Re)Writing Milton |
Chapter Number | 3 |
ISBN | 9780367443047 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367760205 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1626738 |
Files
Accepted Book Chapter
(493 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Women (re)writing Milton on 05 May 2021, available online: http://www.routledge.com/9780367443047
You might also like
Women (Re)Writing Milton
(2021)
Book
Mortal Change: Life After Death in Paradise Lost
(2018)
Journal Article
Vincenzo Cartari's Images of the Gods of the Ancients
(2017)
Journal Article
Leaving the Garden: Re-visioning Eve in Poetry and Art
(2015)
Journal Article
'Joy and Harmles Pastime': Milton and the Ovidian Arts of Leisure
(2014)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search