Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

'Enhanced Third Party Rights in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding'

Antoniadis, Antonis

'Enhanced Third Party Rights in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding' Thumbnail


Authors

Antonis Antoniadis



Abstract

This article examines the issue of enhanced third party rights in the WTO DSU. The origin of broader participatory rights in the GATT practice is explored. Further, in the early WTO jurisprudence and in particular, in EC – Hormones, the Appellate Body determined the conditions under which those rights should be granted and the content thereof. Their foundation on the discretionary authority of the Panels and on considerations of due process was thereby established. This contribution focuses on United States – 1916 Anti-Dumping Act, where the Appellate Body was offered the opportunity to elaborate on the issue in a case where claims of procedural prejudice were raised. In light of the unsatisfactory response of the Appellate Body, an analysis of the DSU provisions is undertaken and the argument that enhanced third party rights have a strong basis in the DSU is advocated. At the same time, the procedural and systemic importance of the issue is highlighted.

Citation

Antoniadis, A. (2002). 'Enhanced Third Party Rights in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding'. Legal issues of European integration, 29(3), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1021215510964

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Dec 1, 2002
Deposit Date Feb 22, 2008
Publicly Available Date Oct 14, 2016
Journal Legal Issues of Economic Integration
Print ISSN 0377-0915
Publisher Kluwer Law International
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 3
Pages 285-304
DOI https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1021215510964
Keywords Third party rights, procedural rights, DSU, WTO.
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1599331
Publisher URL http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/productinfo.php?pubcode=LEIE

Files

Published Journal Article (100 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Reprinted from Legal issues of economic integration, 29(3), 2002, 285-304, with permission of Kluwer Law International.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations