F. Oketch
Comparative evaluation of methods used for sampling malaria vectors in the Kilombero Valley, South Eastern Tanzania
Oketch, F.; Kotas, M.; Kihonda, J.; Killeen, G.F.; Moore, S.J.
Authors
M. Kotas
J. Kihonda
G.F. Killeen
S.J. Moore
Abstract
To monitor malaria transmission, effective sampling methods for host seeking vectors are necessary. The suitability of these methods can be determined by field measurements of their trapping efficiencies. We compared the efficiencies of the Human Landing Catch (HLC), the Centers for Disease Control light trap (CDC-LT) placed next to occupied bednets and the Mbita trap for sampling Anopheles gambiae s.l and Anopheles funestus. The sampling methods were rotated through three houses, each with a human bait, for 8 cycles in a 3 x 3 Latin-square design. Relative to the HLC, the efficiency (and 95% c. i) of the CDC-LT for sampling An. gambiae s.l. was 0.331 (0.237 - 0.460) while that for Mbita trap was 0.031 (0.013 - 0.077). For An. funestus however, the sampling efficiencies were 0.818 (0.611 - 1.096) and 0.022 (0.003-0.165) respectively. We conclude that both the CDC-LT placed next to an occupied bednet and the Mbita trap are less efficient than HLC, the latter being evidently unsuitable for use in the Kilombero Valley.
Citation
Oketch, F., Kotas, M., Kihonda, J., Killeen, G., & Moore, S. (2008). Comparative evaluation of methods used for sampling malaria vectors in the Kilombero Valley, South Eastern Tanzania. The Open tropical medicine journal, 1, 51-55. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874315300801010051
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Aug 12, 2008 |
Deposit Date | Aug 26, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 26, 2015 |
Journal | OPEN TROPICAL MEDICINE JOURNAL |
Electronic ISSN | 1874-3153 |
Publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 1 |
Pages | 51-55 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2174/1874315300801010051 |
Keywords | Anopheles, malaria, Sampling methods, Southern Tanzania. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1556453 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(246 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© Okumu et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search