A. Fuat
The diagnostic accuracy and utility of a B-natriuretic peptide test in a community population of patients with suspected heart failure
Fuat, A.; Hungin, A.; Murphy, J.J.; Curry, J.; Mehrzad, A.A.; Hetherington, A.; Johnston, J.I.; Smellie, W.S.; Duffy, V.; Cawlwy, P.
Authors
A. Hungin
J.J. Murphy
J. Curry
A.A. Mehrzad
A. Hetherington
J.I. Johnston
W.S. Smellie
V. Duffy
P. Cawlwy
Abstract
Background: National guidelines suggest the use of natriuretic peptides in suspected heart failure but there have been no studies comparing assays in primary care. Aim: To test and compare the diagnostic accuracy and utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP) in diagnosing heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with suspected heart failure referred by GPs to one-stop diagnostic clinics. Design of study: Community cohort, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Setting: One-stop diagnostic clinics in Darlington Memorial and Bishop Auckland General Hospitals and general practices in South Durham. Subjects: Two hundred and ninety-seven consecutive patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of heart failure referred from general practice. Method: The study measured sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and area under receiver operating characteristic curve for BNP (near patient assay) and NT proBNP (laboratory assay) in diagnosis of heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The NPV of both assays was determined as a potential method of reducing the number of referrals for echocardiography. Results: One hundred and fourteen of the 297 patients had left ventricular systolic dysfunction (38%). At the manufacturer's recommended cut-off of 100 pg/ml BNP gave a NPV of 82%. BNP performed better at a cut-off of 40 pg/ml with a NPV of 88%. At a cut-off of 150 pg/ml, NT proBNP gave a NPV of 92%. Using cut-offs of 40 pg/ml and 150 pg/ml for BNP and NT pro-BNP, respectively, could have prevented 24% and 25% of referrals to the clinic, respectively. Conclusions: In this setting, NT pro-BNP performed marginally better than BNP, and would be easier to use practically in primary care. A satisfactory cut-off has been identified, which needs validating in general practice. NT pro-BNP could be used to select referrals to a heart failure clinic or for echocardiography. This process needs testing in real-life general practice.
Citation
Fuat, A., Hungin, A., Murphy, J., Curry, J., Mehrzad, A., Hetherington, A., …Cawlwy, P. (2006). The diagnostic accuracy and utility of a B-natriuretic peptide test in a community population of patients with suspected heart failure. British Journal of General Practice, 56(526), 327-333
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 1, 2006 |
Deposit Date | May 30, 2007 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 5, 2017 |
Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
Print ISSN | 0960-1643 |
Electronic ISSN | 1478-5242 |
Publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 56 |
Issue | 526 |
Pages | 327-333 |
Keywords | Diagnoses, Heart failure, Natriuretic peptides. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1548533 |
Publisher URL | http://bjgp.org/content/56/526/327 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1837840&rendertype=abstract |
Files
Published Journal Article
(249 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Transition from childhood to adulthood in coeliac disease: the Prague consensus report
(2016)
Journal Article
What calprotectin cut-offs should apply for IBD in general practice?
(2016)
Journal Article
Faecal biomarker patterns in patients with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search