Professor Nick Vivyan nick.vivyan@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain
Vivyan, Nick; Wagner, Markus
Authors
Markus Wagner
Abstract
To hold their Members of Parliament individually accountable for their legislative behaviour, British voters would need to base their decision to vote for an MP at least partially on the extent to which the MP's legislative voting behaviour deviated from that of the MP's party leadership. Voters should evaluate this deviation contingent on their views of the party leadership. MP rebellion can signal that voter–MP congruence is greater than that of the voter and the MP's party leadership. In this article it is found that only constituents with negative attitudes toward the Labour government reward rebellious Labour MPs, albeit to a limited extent. A similar conditional association is not observed on a single issue: Iraq. The policy accountability of MPs is relatively weak and general rather than issue-specific.
Citation
Vivyan, N., & Wagner, M. (2012). Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 51(2), 235-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01998.x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Mar 1, 2012 |
Deposit Date | Jul 8, 2011 |
Publicly Available Date | May 6, 2016 |
Journal | European Journal of Political Research |
Print ISSN | 0304-4130 |
Electronic ISSN | 1475-6765 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 51 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 235-264 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01998.x |
Keywords | Accountability, British politics, Legislative behaviour, Single-member districts, Voting behaviour. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1539042 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(449 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the following article: Vivyan, Nick & Wagner, Markus (2012), Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 51(2): 235-264, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01998.x. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
You might also like
Advantages, Challenges and Limitations of Audit Experiments with Constituents
(2021)
Journal Article
Psychological Threat and Turnout Misreporting
(2021)
Journal Article
A Choice-Based Measure of Issue Importance in the Electorate
(2020)
Journal Article
Who Votes More Strategically?
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search