Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Prevention of childhood obesity: what type of evidence should we consider relevant ?

Doak, C; Heitmann, B; Summerbell, C; Lissner, L

Prevention of childhood obesity: what type of evidence should we consider relevant ? Thumbnail


Authors

C Doak

B Heitmann

L Lissner



Abstract

Two reviews, one by Summerbell et al. and the other by Doak et al. came to very different conclusions about the effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions. The aim of this commentary is to assess the extent to which inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the definition of effective outcomes, explain discrepant results. Differences in results were compared by inclusion criteria and outcome definitions. The most important summary recommendations for inclusion/exclusion criteria were to exclude all non-peer review articles, to maintain a 6-month lower limit for duration of study, to include interventions from before 1990, to include pre-school age groups, to include pilot studies and to intervene in high-risk communities. Authors did not reach consensus regarding inclusion of aims not specific to preventing weight gain and the manner of assessment of anthropometric measures. Combining both reviews and applying agreed exclusion criteria leaves 30 interventions; 50% are positive. Excluding studies without an aim specific to preventing weight gain leaves 10/24 (42%) positive interventions. The differences in the results of these two reviews relate to the inclusion criteria and outcome assessments. These findings underscore the importance of the evidence considered in assessing interventions.

Citation

Doak, C., Heitmann, B., Summerbell, C., & Lissner, L. (2009). Prevention of childhood obesity: what type of evidence should we consider relevant ?. Obesity Reviews, 10(3), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2008.00550.x

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date May 1, 2009
Publication Date May 1, 2009
Deposit Date May 27, 2009
Publicly Available Date Jul 19, 2010
Journal Obesity Reviews
Print ISSN 1467-7881
Electronic ISSN 1467-789X
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 3
Pages 350-356
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2008.00550.x
Keywords Obesity, Child, Prevention, Review.
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1526954

Files

Accepted Journal Article (269 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley..com.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations