Y. Kosaki
Overshadowing of geometry learning by discrete landmarks in the water maze: Effects of relative salience and relative validity of competing cues
Kosaki, Y.; Austen, J.M.; McGregor, A.
Authors
Dr Joseph Austen j.m.austen@durham.ac.uk
Honorary Associate
Professor Anthony Mcgregor anthony.mcgregor@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
The effects of stimulus salience and cue validity in the overshadowing of geometric features of an enclosed arena by discrete landmarks were investigated in rats using the water maze paradigm. Experiment 1 established that in a rhomboid-shaped arena, the acute corner was more salient than the obtuse corner. In Experiment 2, rats were trained to find a submerged platform either in one of the acute, or obtuse, corners. In addition to the information provided by corner angle, the platform was also signaled by the presence of a spherical landmark suspended above the platform for rats in the experimental group. The landmark was a more valid cue for predicting the location of the platform than the angle of the corner. This training resulted in overshadowing of learning about the angle of the corner by the presence of the landmark. The final experiment extended this result by showing that when the predictive validities of the angle and the landmark were matched in the experimental group, learning about geometry was still overshadowed by the presence of landmarks, but only in animals that were trained with the platform at an obtuse, but not acute, corner. These results uniquely demonstrate that learning about geometry can be overshadowed by discrete landmarks, and also that whether overshadowing is observed depends on the stimulus salience and the relative validity of the competing cues. These findings imply that learning based on geometric cues follows the same basic rules that apply to a wide range of other learning paradigms.
Citation
Kosaki, Y., Austen, J., & McGregor, A. (2013). Overshadowing of geometry learning by discrete landmarks in the water maze: Effects of relative salience and relative validity of competing cues. Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 39(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031199
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Apr 1, 2013 |
Deposit Date | Apr 23, 2012 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 18, 2013 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes |
Print ISSN | 0097-7403 |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-2184 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 126-139 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031199 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1500128 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(612 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2013 APA, all rights reserved. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
You might also like
Precision in spatial working memory examined with mouse pointing
(2023)
Journal Article
Oculomotor rehearsal in visuospatial working memory
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search