Professor Dan Smith daniel.smith2@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Professor Dan Smith daniel.smith2@durham.ac.uk
Professor
K. Ball
Professor Amanda Ellison amanda.ellison@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Covert spatial attention is tightly coupled to the eye-movement system, but the precise nature of this coupling remains contentious. Recent research has argued that covert attention and overt eye-movements many share a common biological limit, such that covert exogenous orienting of attention is limited to stimuli that fall within the range of possible eye movements (the effective oculomotor range: EOMR). However, this conclusion is based on a single experimental paradigm: The Posner cueing task. Here, we examine the extent to which covert spatial attention is limited to the EOMR in visual search. Exogenous attention was assessed using a feature search task and endogenous attention assessed using a conjunction search task. The tasks were performed monocularly with the dominant eye in the frontal position or abducted by 40°. In the abducted position stimuli in the temporal hemispace could be seen, but could not become the goal of a saccadic eye-movement (i.e. they were beyond the EOMR). In contrast, stimuli in the nasal hemifield remained within the EOMR. We observed a significant effect of eye-abduction on feature search, such that search was slower when targets appeared beyond the EOMR. In contrast, eye-abduction had no effect on search times during conjunction search. Set size did not interact with target location or eye-position. It is concluded that optimal covert orienting of exogenous attention in visual search is restricted to locations within the effective oculomotor range.
Smith, D., Ball, K., & Ellison, A. (2014). Covert visual search within and beyond the effective oculomotor range. Vision Research, 95, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.003
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Dec 12, 2013 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Jan 6, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 10, 2014 |
Journal | Vision Research |
Print ISSN | 0042-6989 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 95 |
Pages | 11-17 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.003 |
Keywords | Attention, Exogenous, Eye movement, Endogenous, Oculomotor, Covert visual search. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1473311 |
Accepted Journal Article
(546 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Vision research, 95, February 2014, 10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.003
Dissociating the neural mechanisms of distance and spatial reference frames
(2014)
Journal Article
Object-based attentional facilitation and inhibition are neuropsychologically dissociated
(2015)
Journal Article
Oculomotor preparation as a rehearsal mechanism in spatial working memory
(2014)
Journal Article
The role of the oculomotor system in covert social attention
(2014)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search