Why is combinatorial communication rare in the natural world, and why is language an exception to this trend?

Scott-Phillips, T; Blythe, RA

Abstract

In a combinatorial communication system, some signals consist of the combinations of other signals. Such systems are more efficient than equivalent, non-combinatorial systems, yet despite this they are rare in nature. Why? Previous explanations have focused on the adaptive limits of combinatorial communication, or on its purported cognitive difficulties, but neither of these explains the full distribution of combinatorial communication in the natural world. Here, we present a nonlinear dynamical model of the emergence of combinatorial communication that, unlike previous models, considers how initially non-communicative behaviour evolves to take on a communicative function. We derive three basic principles about the emergence of combinatorial communication. We hence show that the interdependence of signals and responses places significant constraints on the historical pathways by which combinatorial signals might emerge, to the extent that anything other than the most simple form of combinatorial communication is extremely unlikely. We also argue that these constraints can be bypassed if individuals have the socio-cognitive capacity to engage in ostensive communication. Humans, but probably no other species, have this ability. This may explain why language, which is massively combinatorial, is such an extreme exception to nature's general trend for non-combinatorial communication.

Citation

Scott-Phillips, T., & Blythe, R. (2013). Why is combinatorial communication rare in the natural world, and why is language an exception to this trend?. Journal of the Royal Society. Interface, 10(88), Article 20130520. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0520

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Sep 1, 2013
• Deposit Date: Oct 11, 2013
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 19, 2014
• Journal: Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
• Print ISSN: 1742-5689
• Electronic ISSN: 1742-5662
• Publisher: The Royal Society
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 88
• Article Number: 20130520
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0520
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1468215