W.M. van Dijk
Bifurcation instability and chute cutoff development in meandering gravel-bed rivers
van Dijk, W.M.; Schuurman, F.; van de Lageweg, W.I.; Kleinhans, M.G.
Authors
F. Schuurman
W.I. van de Lageweg
M.G. Kleinhans
Abstract
Chute cutoffs reduce sinuosity of meandering rivers and potentially cause a transition from a single to a multiple channel river. The channel bifurcation of the main channel and the mouth of the incipient chute channel controls sediment and flow partitioning and development of the chute. Recent channel bifurcation models suggest that upstream bend radius, gradient advantage, inlet step, and upstream sediment supply at the bifurcation are important factors in the evolution of bifurcations. Our objective is to unravel the relative importance of these factors for chute cutoff success and development. We compare results from a morphodynamic three-dimensional (3D) model and a one-dimensional (1D) model with nodal-point relation with field observations of chute cutoffs in a meandering gravel-bed river. The balance between increased gradient advantage and flow curvature upstream of the chute channel bifurcation was systematically investigated with the 1D model. The 3D model runs and the field observations show the development of two types of chute cutoffs: a scroll-slough cutoff and a bend cutoff. The morphodynamic 3D model demonstrates that chutes are initiated when flow depth exceeds the floodplain elevation. Overbank flow and a significant gradient advantage result in a bend cutoff. The outcome of the 1D model shows that channel curvature at the bifurcation determines the success or failure of the chute cutoff when the chute channel is located at the inner bend, as in the case of scroll-slough cutoffs. We conclude that chute initiation depends on floodplain characteristics, i.e., floodplain elevation, sediment composition, and the presence of vegetation. Chute cutoff success or failure is determined by the dynamics just upstream of the channel bifurcation and location of the chute channel in the bend, which determines channel curvature and gradient advantage. These findings have ramifications for the prediction of chute cutoff in a wide range of rivers under natural and managed conditions and for the understanding of stratigraphy and architecture of deposits.
Citation
van Dijk, W., Schuurman, F., van de Lageweg, W., & Kleinhans, M. (2014). Bifurcation instability and chute cutoff development in meandering gravel-bed rivers. Geomorphology, 213, 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.018
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 23, 2014 |
Publication Date | May 15, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Jan 27, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | May 26, 2015 |
Journal | Geomorphology |
Print ISSN | 0169-555X |
Electronic ISSN | 0094-8659 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 213 |
Pages | 277-291 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.018 |
Keywords | Chute cutoff, Bifurcation, Gravel-bed river, Morphodynamic modelling, Meandering. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1444527 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(5 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Geomorphology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Geomorphology, 213, 15 May 2014, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.018.
You might also like
Bank pull or bar push: what drives scroll-bar formation in meandering river?
(2014)
Journal Article
Swiftness of biomorphodynamics in Lilliput- to Giant-sized rivers and deltas
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search