Distant Intimacy: Space, drones, and just war

Williams, John

Abstract

This article argues that the use of just war theory as the principal framework for ethical assessment of the use of drones for targeted killing is hampered by the absence of a spatial dimension. Drawing on critical political geography, the article develops a concept of “distant intimacy” that explores the spatial characteristics of the relationship between drone deployers and their targets, revealing that the asymmetry of this relationship extends beyond conventional analysis to establish “dronespace” as a place where the autonomy of the target and the possibility of reciprocity are structurally precluded. This extends ethical critique of drone use beyond established concerns and establishes the importance of space and spatiality to the possibility of ethics in a way that just war theory has, to date, been unable to fully appreciate.

Citation

Williams, J. (2015). Distant Intimacy: Space, drones, and just war. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0892679414000793

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Dec 15, 2014
• Online Publication Date: Feb 23, 2015
• Publication Date: Mar 1, 2015
• Deposit Date: Dec 19, 2014
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 12, 2015
• Journal: Ethics and International Affairs
• Print ISSN: 0892-6794
• Electronic ISSN: 1747-7093
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 29
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 93-110
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0892679414000793
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1439548