W.C.M. Resing
Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing
Resing, W.C.M.; Touw, K.W.J.; Veerbeek, J.; Elliott, J.
Abstract
This study investigated potential differences in inductive behavioural and verbal strategy-use between children (aged 6–8 years) from indigenous and non-indigenous backgrounds. This was effected by the use of an electronic device that could present a series of tasks, offer scaffolded assistance and record children’s responses. Children from non-indigenous ethnic backgrounds, starting at a lower level, profited as much from dynamic testing as did indigenous children but were unable to progress to the standard of this latter group. Irrespective of ethnic group, dynamic testing resulted in greater accuracy, fewer corrections, and reduced trial-and-error behaviour than repeated practice. Improvements in strategy-use were noted at both the group and individual level. After dynamic training, children from both ethnic groups showed a superior capacity for inductive reasoning although indigenous children subsequently used more inductive strategies. The study revealed individual differences between and within different ethnic groups and variability in the sorts of help required and subsequent strategy progression paths.
Citation
Resing, W., Touw, K., Veerbeek, J., & Elliott, J. (2017). Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1164300
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 7, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 6, 2016 |
Publication Date | Feb 7, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Apr 12, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | May 29, 2018 |
Journal | Educational Psychology |
Print ISSN | 0144-3410 |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-5820 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 37 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 173-191 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1164300 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1407085 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
You might also like
It’s Time to Be Scientific About Dyslexia
(2020)
Journal Article
The dyslexia debate: life without the label
(2020)
Journal Article
Research studies on dyslexia: participant inclusion and exclusion criteria
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search