Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing

Resing, W.C.M.; Touw, K.W.J.; Veerbeek, J.; Elliott, J.

Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing Thumbnail


Authors

W.C.M. Resing

K.W.J. Touw

J. Veerbeek



Abstract

This study investigated potential differences in inductive behavioural and verbal strategy-use between children (aged 6–8 years) from indigenous and non-indigenous backgrounds. This was effected by the use of an electronic device that could present a series of tasks, offer scaffolded assistance and record children’s responses. Children from non-indigenous ethnic backgrounds, starting at a lower level, profited as much from dynamic testing as did indigenous children but were unable to progress to the standard of this latter group. Irrespective of ethnic group, dynamic testing resulted in greater accuracy, fewer corrections, and reduced trial-and-error behaviour than repeated practice. Improvements in strategy-use were noted at both the group and individual level. After dynamic training, children from both ethnic groups showed a superior capacity for inductive reasoning although indigenous children subsequently used more inductive strategies. The study revealed individual differences between and within different ethnic groups and variability in the sorts of help required and subsequent strategy progression paths.

Citation

Resing, W., Touw, K., Veerbeek, J., & Elliott, J. (2017). Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1164300

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 7, 2016
Online Publication Date Apr 6, 2016
Publication Date Feb 7, 2017
Deposit Date Apr 12, 2016
Publicly Available Date May 29, 2018
Journal Educational Psychology
Print ISSN 0144-3410
Electronic ISSN 1469-5820
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 37
Issue 2
Pages 173-191
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1164300
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1407085

Files

Published Journal Article (1.4 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations