D.J. Marshall
Mapping civil society with social network analysis: Methodological possibilities and limitations
Marshall, D.J.; Staeheli, L.
Authors
L. Staeheli
Abstract
This paper explores the possibility of using social network analysis and visualization as a tool for qualitative research in human geography. The approach uses formal network analysis in concert with ethnographic research methods. Specifically, we take a performative approach to network analysis that sees network visualization as a process that produces space for research. Using networks of civil society organizations as our example, this paper highlights the debates over what social network analysis allows and omits, focusing in particular on issues related to flows, power, boundary demarcation and abstraction. From a methodological perspective, much can be lost when the conceptual and theoretical arguments about networks are applied to the material and embodied practices that constitute network relations. Nevertheless, the formal analysis of such networks can provide a representation of relationships at a moment in time that can help to both express those relationships and to open new questions that can be explored using other methods. Just as abstraction is used in an iterative process to move between empirical evidence and conceptual and theoretical arguments, the representation of networks can be part of a methodological approach that moves between the representation of relationships and the ways that various agents express, experience, and remake those relationships. Using the example of research on NGOs and civil society organizations promoting citizenship for young people in divided societies, we explore the utility – and limitations – of working in the liminal space of formal network analysis and more ethnographic approaches.
Citation
Marshall, D., & Staeheli, L. (2015). Mapping civil society with social network analysis: Methodological possibilities and limitations. Geoforum, 61, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.015
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 1, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jun 16, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 18, 2017 |
Journal | Geoforum |
Print ISSN | 0016-7185 |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-9398 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 61 |
Pages | 56-66 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.015 |
Keywords | Civil society, Social network analysis, Actor-network theory, Diagramming, Abstraction, Hybrid methods. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1406319 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(285 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Geoforum. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Geoforum, 61, May 2015, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.015.
You might also like
Circulations and the Entanglements of Citizenship Formation
(2016)
Journal Article
Love stories of the occupation: storytelling and the counter-geopolitics of intimacy
(2014)
Journal Article
‘All the Beautiful Things’: Trauma, Aesthetics and the Politics of Palestinian Childhood
(2013)
Journal Article
The double-occupation of Palestine
(2011)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search