Rachael Wiseman
What am I and what am I doing?
Wiseman, Rachael
Authors
Abstract
There is a deep connection between Anscombe’s argument that ‘I’ is not a referring expression and Intention’s account of practical knowledge and knowledge without observation. The assumption that the so-called “no-reference thesis” can be resisted while the account of action set out in her book INTENTION is embraced is based on a misunderstanding of the argument of “The First Person” and the status of its conclusion; removing that misunderstanding helps to illuminate the concept of practical knowledge and brings into view a novel account of the relation between self-consciousness, agency, and first-person thought.
Citation
Wiseman, R. (2017). What am I and what am I doing?. Journal of Philosophy, 114(10), 536-550. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20171141037
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 23, 2017 |
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jun 23, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 1, 2018 |
Journal | Journal of Philosophy |
Print ISSN | 0022-362X |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-8549 |
Publisher | Journal of Philosophy |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 114 |
Issue | 10 |
Pages | 536-550 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20171141037 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1376191 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(545 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the peer-reviewed version of the following article: Wiseman, Rachael (2017). What am I and what am I doing? Journal of Philosophy 114(10): 536-550., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20171141037. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes only.
You might also like
G. E. M. Anscombe
(2017)
Book Chapter
Anscombe
(2016)
Book Chapter
The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Intention
(2016)
Journal Article