K. Whitfield
Employee Share Ownership and Organisational Performance: A Tentative Opening of the Black Box
Whitfield, K.; Pendleton, A.; Sengupta, S.; Huxley, K.
Authors
A. Pendleton
S. Sengupta
K. Huxley
Abstract
Purpose A range of studies have shown that performance is typically higher in organisations with employee share ownership (ESO) schemes in place. Many possible causal mechanisms explaining this relationship have been suggested. These include a reduction in labour turnover, synergies with other forms of productivity-enhancing communication and participation schemes, and synergies with employer-provided training. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper empirically assesses these potential linkages using data from the 2004 and 2011 British Workplace Employment Relations Surveys, and provides comparisons with earlier analyses conducted on the 1990 and 1998 versions of the survey. Findings Substantial differences are found between the 2004 and 2011 results: a positive relationship between ESO and workplace productivity and financial performance, observed in 2004, is no longer present in 2011. In both years, ESO is found to have no clear relationship with labour turnover, and there is no significant association between turnover and performance. There is, however, a positive moderating relationship with downward communication schemes in 2004 and in 2011 in the case of labour productivity. There is no corresponding relationship for upward involvement schemes. Research limitations/implications The results are only partially supportive of extant theory and its various predictions, and the relationship between ESO and performance seems to have weakened over time. Originality/value The study further questions the rhetoric offered in support of wider ESO.
Citation
Whitfield, K., Pendleton, A., Sengupta, S., & Huxley, K. (2017). Employee Share Ownership and Organisational Performance: A Tentative Opening of the Black Box. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1280-1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2016-0243
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 25, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 16, 2017 |
Publication Date | Oct 16, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jun 16, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 20, 2017 |
Journal | Personnel Review |
Print ISSN | 0048-3486 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 46 |
Issue | 7 |
Pages | 1280-1296 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2016-0243 |
Keywords | Quantitative, Organisational performance, Strategic HRM. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1357317 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(227 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accepted Journal Article
(307 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© Keith Whitfield, Andrew Pendleton, Sukanya Sengupta and Katy Huxley 2017 Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
You might also like
Ownership and pay in Britain
(2017)
Journal Article
The productivity effects of multiple pay incentives
(2016)
Journal Article
Employee ownership in Britain Today
(2017)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search