Professor Markus Hausmann markus.hausmann@durham.ac.uk
Head of Department
Language lateralisation measured across linguistic and national boundaries
Hausmann, M.; Brysbaert, M.; Van der Haegen, L.; Lewald, J.; Specht, K.; Hirnstein, M.; Willemin, J.; Barton, J.; Buchilly, D.; Chmetz, F.; Roch, M.; Brederoo, S.; Dael, N.; Mohr, C.
Authors
M. Brysbaert
L. Van der Haegen
J. Lewald
K. Specht
M. Hirnstein
J. Willemin
J. Barton
D. Buchilly
F. Chmetz
M. Roch
S. Brederoo
N. Dael
C. Mohr
Abstract
The visual half-field technique has been shown to be a reliable and valid neuropsychological measurement of language lateralisation, typically showing higher accuracy and faster correct responses for linguistic stimuli presented in the right visual field (RVF) than left visual field (LVF). The RVF advantage corresponds to the well-known dominance of the left hemisphere (LH) in processing language(s). However, clinical and experimental neuroscientists around the globe use different variations of the visual half-field paradigm, making direct comparisons difficult. The current study used a word/non-word visual half-field paradigm with translingual stimuli. In total, 496 participants from seven European countries were investigated: Belgium (64), England (49), Germany (85), Italy (34), The Netherlands (87), Norway (51), and Switzerland (126), covering six international languages (Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian). All language groups revealed a significant RVF/LH advantage in accuracy and reaction times that accounted for up to 26.1% of the total variance in performance. We found some variation in the degree of the RVF/LH advantage across language groups, accounting for a maximum of 3.7% of the total variance in performance. The RVF/LH advantage did not differ between subsamples speaking English, French or German as first or second languages or between monolingual and early/late bi/multilinguals. The findings suggest that the translingual lexical decision task (TLDT) is a simple but reliable measurement of language lateralisation that can be applied clinically and experimentally across linguistic and national boundaries.
Citation
Hausmann, M., Brysbaert, M., Van der Haegen, L., Lewald, J., Specht, K., Hirnstein, M., …Mohr, C. (2019). Language lateralisation measured across linguistic and national boundaries. Cortex, 111, 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.020
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 22, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 3, 2018 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Oct 22, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 3, 2019 |
Journal | Cortex |
Print ISSN | 0010-9452 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 111 |
Pages | 134-147 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.020 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1344692 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(1.7 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2018 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Spatial anxiety and self-confidence mediate sex/gender differences in mental rotation
(2022)
Journal Article
Sex/gender differences in verbal fluency and verbal episodic memory - a meta-analysis
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search