Sarah R. Hill
Economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions: Is the evidence sufficient? A review of methodological challenges
Hill, Sarah R.; Vale, Luke; Hunter, David; Henderson, Emily; Oluboyede, Yemi
Authors
Luke Vale
David Hunter
Emily Henderson
Yemi Oluboyede
Abstract
Public health interventions have unique characteristics compared to health technologies, which present additional challenges for economic evaluation (EE). High quality EEs that are able to address the particular methodological challenges are important for public health decision-makers. In England, they are even more pertinent given the transition of public health responsibilities in 2013 from the National Health Service to local government authorities where new agents are shaping policy decisions. Addressing alcohol misuse is a globally prioritised public health issue. This article provides a systematic review of EE and priority-setting studies for interventions to prevent and reduce alcohol misuse published internationally over the past decade (2006–2016). This review appraises the EE and priority-setting evidence to establish whether it is sufficient to meet the informational needs of public health decision-makers. 619 studies were identified via database searches. 7 additional studies were identified via hand searching journals, grey literature and reference lists. 27 met inclusion criteria. Methods identified included cost-utility analysis (18), cost-effectiveness analysis (6), cost-benefit analysis (CBA) (1), cost-consequence analysis (CCA) (1) and return-on-investment (1). The review identified a lack of consideration of methodological challenges associated with evaluating public health interventions and limited use of methods such as CBA and CCA which have been recommended as potentially useful for EE in public health. No studies using other specific priority-setting tools were identified.
Citation
Hill, S. R., Vale, L., Hunter, D., Henderson, E., & Oluboyede, Y. (2017). Economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions: Is the evidence sufficient? A review of methodological challenges. Health Policy, 121(12), 1249-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.003
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 18, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 27, 2017 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Dec 19, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 20, 2017 |
Journal | Health Policy |
Print ISSN | 0168-8510 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 121 |
Issue | 12 |
Pages | 1249-1262 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.003 |
Keywords | Economic evaluation, Public health, Alcohol interventions, Priority-setting, Health economics, Methodological challenges. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1337954 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
The Public Health System in England.
(2010)
Book
The Health Debate
(2008)
Book
Managing for Health
(2007)
Book
The expanding role of primary care in cancer control
(2015)
Journal Article
Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search