Tom H.E. Mason
Wicked conflict: Using wicked problem thinking for holistic management of conservation conflict
Mason, Tom H.E.; Pollard, Chris R.J.; Chimalakonda, Deepthi; Guerrero, Angela M.; Kerr-Smith, Catherine; Milheiras, Sergio A.G.; Roberts, Michaela; Ngafack, Paul R.; Bunnefeld, Nils
Authors
Chris R.J. Pollard
Deepthi Chimalakonda
Angela M. Guerrero
Catherine Kerr-Smith
Sergio A.G. Milheiras
Michaela Roberts
Paul R. Ngafack
Nils Bunnefeld
Abstract
Conservation conflict is widespread, damaging, and has proved difficult to manage using conventional conservation approaches. Conflicts are often “wicked problems,” lacking clear solutions due to divergent values of stakeholders, and being embedded within wickedly complex environments. Drawing on the concept of wicked environmental problems could lead to management strategies better suited to tackling conflict. However, it is unclear whether managers are embracing ideas from the wicked problems concept. There is currently a lack of guidance for applying strategies to tackle particular wicked problems, such as conservation conflict. We explored the suitability of wicked problems‐inspired management, using eight contemporary conflict case studies. Conservation conflict was managed predominantly using conventional approaches suited to tackling single objectives in simple environments, rather than balancing competing objectives in complex environments. To deal with different characteristics of wickedness, we recommend that managers develop strategies combining distributed decision‐making, diverse opinions, pattern‐based predictions, trade‐off‐based objectives, and reporting of failures. Recent advances in conservation conflict research have focused on improving interactions among stakeholders. We believe that such stakeholder‐focused approaches would dovetail with the whole‐system focus of a wicked problems framework, allowing conservationists to move toward a holistic strategy for managing conservation conflict.
Citation
Mason, T. H., Pollard, C. R., Chimalakonda, D., Guerrero, A. M., Kerr-Smith, C., Milheiras, S. A., Roberts, M., Ngafack, P. R., & Bunnefeld, N. (2018). Wicked conflict: Using wicked problem thinking for holistic management of conservation conflict. Conservation Letters, 11(6), Article e12460. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12460
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 27, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 15, 2018 |
Publication Date | Nov 30, 2018 |
Deposit Date | May 10, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | May 10, 2018 |
Journal | Conservation Letters |
Publisher | Society for Conservation Biology |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 6 |
Article Number | e12460 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12460 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1332057 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(808 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Published Journal Article (Advance online version)
(808 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Advance online version © 2018 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search