Wage Exploitation and the Nonworseness Claim: Allowing the Wrong, to Do More Good

Faraci, David

Abstract

Many believe that employment can be wrongfully exploitative, even if it is consensual and mutually beneficial. At the same time, it may seem third parties should not do anything to preclude or eliminate such arrangements, given these same considerations of consent and benefit. I argue that there are perfectly sensible, intuitive ethical positions that vindicate this “Reasonable View.” The view requires such defense because the literature often suggests that there is no theoretical space for it. I respond to arguments for the clearest symptom of this obscuration: the so-called nonworseness claim that a consensual, mutually beneficial transaction cannot be “morally worse” than its absence. In addition to making space for the Reasonable View, this serves my dialectical goal of encouraging distinct attention to first- and third-party obligations.

Citation

Faraci, D. (2019). Wage Exploitation and the Nonworseness Claim: Allowing the Wrong, to Do More Good. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2018.28

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jul 24, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Jan 4, 2019
• Publication Date: Apr 30, 2019
• Deposit Date: Nov 13, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Nov 14, 2018
• Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly
• Print ISSN: 1052-150X
• Electronic ISSN: 2153-3326
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 29
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 169-188
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2018.28
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1314138