Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The Aarhus statement on cancer diagnostic research: turning recommendations into new survey instruments

Coxon, Domenica; Campbell, Christine; Walter, Fiona M.; Scott, Suzanne E.; Neal, Richard D.; Vedsted, Peter; Emery, Jon; Rubin, Greg; Hamilton, William; Weller, David

The Aarhus statement on cancer diagnostic research: turning recommendations into new survey instruments Thumbnail


Authors

Domenica Coxon

Christine Campbell

Fiona M. Walter

Suzanne E. Scott

Richard D. Neal

Peter Vedsted

Jon Emery

Greg Rubin

William Hamilton

David Weller



Abstract

Background Over recent years there has been a growth in cancer early diagnosis (ED) research, which requires valid measurement of routes to diagnosis and diagnostic intervals. The Aarhus Statement, published in 2012, provided methodological guidance to generate valid data on these key pre-diagnostic measures. However, there is still a wide variety of measuring instruments of varying quality in published research. In this paper we test comprehension of self-completion ED questionnaire items, based on Aarhus Statement guidance, and seek input from patients, GPs and ED researchers to refine these questions. Methods We used personal interviews and consensus approaches to generate draft ED questionnaire items, then a combination of focus groups and telephone interviews to test comprehension and obtain feedback. A framework analysis approach was used, to identify themes and potential refinements to the items. Results We found that many of the questionnaire items still prompted uncertainty in respondents, in both routes to diagnosis and diagnostic interval measurement. Uncertainty was greatest in the context of multiple or vague symptoms, and potentially ambiguous time-points (such as ‘date of referral’). Conclusions There are limits on the validity of self-completion questionnaire responses, and refinements to the wording of questions may not be able to completely overcome these limitations. It’s important that ED researchers use the best identifiable measuring instruments, but accommodate inevitable uncertainty in the interpretation of their results. Every effort should be made to increase clarity of questions and responses, and use of two or more data sources should be considered.

Citation

Coxon, D., Campbell, C., Walter, F. M., Scott, S. E., Neal, R. D., Vedsted, P., …Weller, D. (2018). The Aarhus statement on cancer diagnostic research: turning recommendations into new survey instruments. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), Article 677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3476-0

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 16, 2018
Online Publication Date Sep 3, 2018
Publication Date Sep 3, 2018
Deposit Date Sep 21, 2018
Publicly Available Date Sep 21, 2018
Journal BMC Health Services Research
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 18
Issue 1
Article Number 677
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3476-0

Files

Published Journal Article (691 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations