Professor Russell Craig russell.craig@durham.ac.uk
Academic Visitor
This paper explores the nature and impact of research misconduct in psychology by analyzing 160 articles that were retracted from prominent scholarly journals between 1998 and 2017. We compare findings with recent studies of retracted papers in economics, and business and management, to profile practices that are likely to be problematic in cognate social science disciplines. In psychology, the principal reason for retraction was data fabrication. Retractions took longer to make, and generally were from higher ranked and more prestigious journals, than in the two cognate disciplines. We recommend that journal editors should be more forthcoming in the reasons they provide for article retractions. We also recommend that the discipline of psychology gives a greater priority to the publication of replication studies; initiates a debate about how to respond to failed replications; adopts a more critical attitude to the importance of attaining statistical significance; discourages p-hacking and Hypothesizing After Results are Known (HARKing); assesses the long-term effects of pre-registering research; and supports stronger procedures to attest to the authenticity of data in research papers. Our contribution locates these issues in the context of a growing crisis of confidence in the value of social science research. We also challenge individual researchers to reassert the primacy of disinterested academic inquiry above pressures that can lead to an erosion of scholarly integrity.
Craig, R., Cox, A., Tourish, D., & Thorpe, A. (2020). Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done?. Research Policy, 49(4), Article 103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 31, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 12, 2020 |
Publication Date | May 30, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Feb 1, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 12, 2021 |
Journal | Research Policy |
Print ISSN | 0048-7333 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-7625 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 49 |
Issue | 4 |
Article Number | 103930 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1309033 |
Accepted Journal Article
(207 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2020 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Liberalising accounting curricula using ‘angles of vision’
(2014)
Book Chapter
Exploring signs of hubris in CEO language
(2014)
Book Chapter
Elevating Financial Reporting Beyond a Mere Compliance Instrument*
(2022)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search