Aoife O'Donoghue
Syria & Locating Tyranny, Hegemony and Anarchy in Contemporary International Law
O'Donoghue, Aoife
Authors
Abstract
Substantive renderings of tyranny, hegemony or anarchy as governance forms within international law seldom appear. When invoked, tyranny and anarchy are presented as exceptional while hegemony, in accounts often borrowed from international relations scholarship, is defined as mundane and a natural explanation of international legal governance. This article puts forward substantive accounts of all three—tyranny, anarchy and hegemony—and utilises these to understand a single event, the airstrikes against Syria after the use of chemical weapons by the Assad Government in 2018. This event is first described in detail. The article examines the current use of the three theories in international legal theory and considers their substantive content. Next, these three theories are applied both singularly and in combination to the events in Syria to demonstrate what can be observed about international law through their deployment. This article shows the value of understanding the operation of international law through each of these prisms in their substantive form but also, and most markedly, what can be understood when all three frames are combined to explore a single event.
Citation
O'Donoghue, A. (2020). Syria & Locating Tyranny, Hegemony and Anarchy in Contemporary International Law. Jus Cogens, 2(1), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00015-0
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 17, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 2, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-08 |
Deposit Date | Mar 18, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 2, 2021 |
Journal | Jus Cogens. |
Print ISSN | 2524-3977 |
Electronic ISSN | 2524-3985 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 29-55 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00015-0 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1305947 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(606 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Jus Cogens. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00015-0
You might also like
Life after Brexit: Operationalising the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement’s Principle of Consent
(2019)
Journal Article
"Ourworld": A Feminist Approach to Global Constitutionalism
(2019)
Journal Article
Can Global Constitutionalism be Feminist?
(2019)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search